Legal provisions governing medical decisions to intervene

By Sgkabra Views: 10427

Https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/admincp/edit_article.php?id=21573

A succinct breakdown of the legal provisions governing medical decisions to intervene:
- Patient Autonomy: Article 21 of the Constitution guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, which includes a competent individual's right to decide what medical interventions they accept or refuse.
- Physician’s Duty: A physician must obtain consent before performing any medical procedure on a patient.
- Consent: Governed by IPC Section 88 and related provisions, consent can be free, informed, surrogate, or implied. These legal stipulations ensure patient protection from arbitrary medical decisions. The doctrines of Good Faith and Beneficial Intent further safeguard patient interests.
- Immunity to Physicians: The IPC provides immunity to physicians from legal action for harm, injury, or even death resulting from medical interventions, provided they act within legal provisions, with due consent, competence, care, and caution.
- Withholding & Withdrawing Treatment: Withholding treatment occurs when a patient denies consent for an indicated intervention, while withdrawing treatment happens when a patient or surrogate consents to stopping an ongoing intervention. Guidelines exist to protect physicians from malpractice claims.
- Medical Norms: Physicians must adhere to case-specific, context-specific, and situation-specific medical norms. Professional bodies set these norms and retrospectively review decisions. Consumer forums interfering in medical practice have led to chaos, negatively impacting patient care.
- Medical Negligence: Defined as failure to follow applicable medical norms during treatment. To prove negligence, the alleged deficiency must be shown to directly cause harm. Only competent physicians can determine applicable norms.
- Living Will/Advance Directive: A competent person can direct their surrogates on medical decisions if they become incapacitated. In India, bedside decisions rely on verbal directives rather than written proof, making registered wills impractical in emergency situations.
More detailed explanation of each legal provision governing medical intervention:
1. Patient Autonomy
  Under Article 21 of the Constitution, every competent individual has the fundamental right to decide what medical treatments can or cannot be performed on their body. This autonomy means that no one—not even a physician—can impose medical intervention on a patient against their will. The right to bodily integrity extends to refusing life-saving treatment if the patient is of sound mind and fully aware of the consequences.
2. Physician’s Duty
  A physician has a legal and ethical duty to obtain valid consent before performing any intervention on a patient. Without consent, even an act of saving a life could constitute assault. The duty is particularly critical in invasive procedures, surgeries, or experimental treatments. Any violation of this principle may result in legal consequences.
3. Consent
  Consent, as outlined in Section 88 of the IPC, ensures that medical decisions are made with due regard for patient rights. Different types of consent include:
  - Free Consent: Given voluntarily, without coercion or undue influence.
  - Informed Consent: The patient is provided with complete information about risks, benefits, and alternatives before making a decision.
  - Surrogate Consent: Given by family members or guardians when the patient is incapable of consent.
  - Implied Consent: Presumed in emergencies where immediate intervention is necessary to save a life.
  The doctrines of Good Faith and Beneficial Intent, enshrined in the IPC, reinforce the physician’s responsibility to act in the patient’s best interest while ensuring their legal protection.
4. Immunity to Physicians
  The IPC provides legal immunity to physicians for any adverse outcomes arising from their medical interventions, provided:
  - The intervention was performed in good faith.
  - Consent—whether free, informed, implied, or surrogate—was properly obtained.
  - The procedure was undertaken for the patient’s benefit.
  Even if harm, grievous injury, or death results from the physician’s actions, the law does not hold them accountable as long as due competence, care, and caution were observed.
5. Withholding & Withdrawing Treatment
  Medical intervention can be withheld or withdrawn based on real-time bedside decisions:
  - Withholding Treatment: If a patient refuses a recommended intervention (negative consent), the physician must respect their choice, even if the refusal leads to deterioration.
  - Withdrawing Treatment: This occurs when a patient or surrogate provides positive consent to stop a life-supporting or life-sustaining measure. Guidelines exist to protect physicians from allegations of wrongdoing when withdrawing life-support measures, ensuring decisions align with ethical and legal standards.
6. Medical Norms
  A physician’s decisions are bound by established medical norms that are highly case-specific, context-specific, and situation-specific.
  - The treating physician is the sole judge in bedside scenarios.
  - The validity of a decision can be retrospectively reviewed by professional medical bodies.
  - The overreach of consumer forums in challenging medical decisions has led to chaotic consequences, often jeopardizing patient care. Medical associations define norms and ensure accountability, but external interference can disrupt clinical judgment.
7. Medical Negligence
  Medical negligence is defined as failure to follow established diagnostic or therapeutic norms. To prove negligence:
  - It must be established what medical norms were applicable during treatment.
  - Only competent physicians can determine whether those norms were followed.
  - The alleged deficiency must be shown to directly cause the harm in question.
  Negligence claims must be backed by evidence showing a clear link between deviation from norms and patient damage.
8. Living Will/Advance Directive
  A living will or advance directive allows a competent person to dictate medical decisions for a future scenario where they become incapacitated.
  - In India, bedside decisions often rely on verbal directives from the patient’s surrogate rather than written documents.
  - A formal registered will is impractical in critical care settings where real-time decisions must be made.
  - If a surrogate refuses intervention based on the patient’s past directives, it holds legal weight in end-of-life situations.
Some real-world examples illustrating how these legal provisions are applied in medical practice:
1. Patient Autonomy
  A terminally ill cancer patient refuses chemotherapy, opting for palliative care instead. Despite the physician's recommendation for aggressive treatment, the patient's right to autonomy under Article 21 allows them to make this decision.
2. Physician’s Duty
  Before performing surgery, a doctor explains the risks and benefits to the patient and obtains informed consent. If the doctor proceeds without consent, it could be considered medical assault.
3. Consent
  - Free Consent: A patient voluntarily agrees to a blood transfusion without external pressure.
  - Informed Consent: A surgeon explains the risks of a heart procedure, and the patient signs a consent form acknowledging understanding.
  - Surrogate Consent: A child requires emergency surgery, and their parents provide consent on their behalf.
  - Implied Consent: A patient in a coma is rushed into surgery to stop internal bleeding—consent is presumed in life-threatening situations.
4. Immunity to Physicians
  A surgeon performs a high-risk operation with due competence and caution, but the patient does not survive. Since the procedure was done in good faith and with proper consent, the surgeon is protected from legal action.
5. Withholding & Withdrawing Treatment
  - Withholding Treatment: A patient with advanced kidney failure refuses dialysis, and the physician respects their decision.
  - Withdrawing Treatment: A ventilator-dependent patient’s family, citing the patient’s prior wishes, requests withdrawal of life support. The physician follows legal guidelines to ensure ethical compliance.
6. Medical Norms
  A physician treating a rare infection follows standard medical protocols set by professional bodies. If a dispute arises, experts review whether the physician adhered to accepted norms.
7. Medical Negligence
  A doctor prescribes the wrong medication, leading to severe complications. If it is proven that the doctor failed to follow established treatment norms, they may be held liable for negligence.
8. Living Will/Advance Directive
  An elderly patient verbally instructs their family not to allow resuscitation in case of cardiac arrest. When the situation arises, the family refuses CPR based on the patient’s advance directive, and the physician respects their decision.