Kids are the paragon of development and eventual fate of a country. So a protected climate should be accommodated most extreme sustain of their personality. Additionally India, is a home to the biggest youngster population. Be that as it may, in ongoing time we saw , a high pace of adolescent offenses in India, which is a main pressing issue.

A kid is born innocent , and he should be gave with an all physical, mental ,moral and other worldly improvement to make them one of the compelled by a sense of honor resident of this biggest vote based system. Be that as it may, along these lines kids because of a few elements, at all it might be,turns them into teenage delequent. And that implies changing a guiltless kid to an adolescent guilty party.

Consequently our criminal law, with respect to teenage guilty parties says that , anticipation is superior to fix in regards to adolescents and they should be safeguarded from going in an off-base way, and that is the reason why our Indian legal framework gives accentuation on Reformatory type of discipline to an adolescent wrongdoer. Additionally our constitution accommodates a seperate treatment for kids.

Juvenile Justice System is the most developing framework took on by the world population with all round development of kids. The excellent center is to change the degenerates and give care to the unprotected youngster. To the extent that practicable, a youngster to be restored and reestablished to the family.

The extraordinary court to embrace the principle of parens patriae while arbitrating the issue of kid in struggle with the law. The article assessed the JJS in India in the illumination of established way of thinking and International boundaries.

The system of juvenile justice in India is still a crucial debate to talk on it has been more into limelight since the Nirbhaya Rape Case. The minor who gave the most brutal injuries to the victim still his punishment was being discussed weather to treat him under the juvenile court or should be given a punishment that would thrill any minor or adult with the fear of even thinking to commit such crime.

Most of the crimes generally committed by the minor are due to their wrong influence, lack of complete knowledge, their aggressive approaches and the crimes done by the young boys and girls are constantly increasing which should lead to even more strict justice system in India for them. Moreover, many of the people after the Nirbhaya case came to know about juvenile justice that there is an another court also for the juvenile's and the crime committed by them.

In India the government still needs to work the juvenile justice as the crimes by the end of the minors are tending to increase constantly. The juvenile justice system in India is still treating the criminals as minors who do not have much sense or do not know the consequences of the act done by them but this should be applicable only to the infants and the group of non-teenagers otherwise mostly the teenagers entering into the teenage simultaneously also enters in the world of fantacies most of the youngsters out of the influence from different factors often commit crimes specially from the social media and the entertainment industry most of the movies showcase crimes in such way where it turns to be heroic most of the movies depicts the life of the protagonist starting as a criminal and ending to be a social worker for the people out there and there inspiration it is generally done by showcasing the story of young boys in various films.

There are lot of Bollywood movies which even give rise to such crimes and criminals of teenage. Every where its showcased the positive outcomes but why don't the people show and see the right and real image. These practices are affecting the teenage at such a level which is difficult even to imagine but nowadays there is nothing new in the crimes committed by the teenagers and them being forgived just for the sake of their age and not treating them according to their mentalities.

Nowadays as we are growing in each and every sector being open to each and everything we can also see young boys and girls being curious of some unexpected and unwanted habits.

If we see the drug consumption is found more among the students where they stake their lives harming themselves and leaving their families in mental agony and also ruining the life of their companions by forcing them . Here is the thing where juvenile courts needs to be strict regarding their decisions they should not only punish but also come out with the effective remedies regarding it. And also the people who are involved in promoting and upbringing of criminals in the young children's should be taken action against. Because most of the criminal minds are created by the advice and influence of such people who ruin the lives of youngsters.

The juvenile justice (Care and protection) Act, 2015
According to the juvenile justice , section 2 sub section 12 a child is who has not completed the age of eighteen years.

This is further classified as:
"child in conflict with law"
"child in need of care and protection"

Child in conflict with law means any victim who has committed a heinous crime and has not attained the age of majority.

The Juvenile Justice System expects that a kid wrongdoer is a result of ominous environment and is qualified for a new opportunity to start his life. The offenses might have been perpetrated with next to no criminal expectation on specific events. The kid most likely needs premonition on the repercussions of his activities. It is acknowledged that a kid wrongdoer ought not be given discipline in view of the sort of offense he/she has committed yet ought to be given a singular treatment which is reformative in nature and which depends on his/her need, mental and social foundation.

And as per the section of juvenile justice 2(d) child talks basically about the rights of the children where the children goes through various contengencies while living under their parent and guardian who are negligent towards the care of the children. Many children live under the abusive environment either it be sexual or mental abuse living their life in havoc where the parent or guardian is unfit for the same where the child is exploited on different heinous grounds where he children are indulged into different drug abuse and trafficking.

The child and protection here takes a stand in favour of these kids they are send to shelter homes as required according to the inspection of the police officer. In the section 82 and 83 of IPC states that any child who has attained the age seven years is not capable of understanding the positive or negative outcomes of the acts done by him. Or the child only be convicted if he is known to the entire facts and repurcurssions of the acts done by him.

And has attained the entire knowledge while proceeding of any heinous crimes. In order to understand the change we must understand the need that why was it required we need to understand the brutalities faced by the victims their grief and anguish which compelled advocate Shweta Kapoor to file PIL in Delhi High Court demanding the amendment in juvenile justice ( care and protection) 2000 to deal with the age group of the children who are involved in committing the heinous crimes.

"Minds of juveniles who have attained the age of 16 and commit serious crimes are well developed and they do not need care and protection of the society. Rather, the society needs care and protection against them," said the PIL.

Another aspect worth deliberating on is the definition of the word 'heinous'. In order to try a person 16-18 years old, as an adult, he must be accused of a heinous crime. The 2015 Act, in section 2(33), defines 'heinous crimes' as "those crimes for which the minimum punishment under the IPC or any other law for the time being in force is imprisonment for seven years or more."

In the case of Saurabh Jalinder Nangre vs. State of Maharashtra. In this case, the High Court dealt with a writ petition, raising the issue regarding necessity of sending the juvenile to children court. The offence committed was of attempt to murder punishable under Section 307 IPC. Under the premise of the said definition of heinous crimes given in the 2015 act, the court decided that:
In the present case, all the petitioners though are between the age group of 16 to 18 years, they have not committed heinous offences and, therefore, their case is not covered under section 15 of the said Act and thus the case cannot be transferred to Children's Court. Hence, the inquiry is to be conducted by Juvenile Justice Board, Sangli.

In this way, the court totally put away the way that those 17-year olds made an endeavor to remove somebody's life and cause a damage, and chose to regard them as adolescents and absolving them from the discipline they merited. It is critical to take note of that setting such definition makes wrongdoing resemble a consequence old enough cycle, while actually wrongdoing is what a thoughtful causes you to do and 16 years old is enough for an individual to be trustworthy and think about what is good and bad.

Also, endeavor to kill is in a layman's language a bombed activity of killing somebody. When at this age they were sufficiently competent to thinking and following up on the craving of killing somebody, for what reason would they say they were not adequately proficient to be attempted and punished as grown-ups?

Crime is definitely not a wrong disallowed under a law. It is an off-base that researchers have characterized as ethically unpardonable, and causing harm far past only the person in question. That is the justification for why wrongdoing is focussed on as a wrong against state. While managing the blamed for these violations, we take a gander at individuals who conspicuously proceed with challenging the power of regulation as well as harming the soundness of the general public.

These infringement are not limited to any gathering, in that capacity, be it age, class, orientation or some other characterization. Consistently, through different violations, we have seen that a crook needs to gathering to stay by, no grouping to contrast him from, its simply him and his demonstration. On the comparable lines, this severe differentiation of an individual under 18 years old not being attempted as a grown-up was an imperfect idea. Furthermore, it is an advancement of Indian equity framework to get rid of this proviso.

It is critical to comprehend that while hearing a case, the conditions of the said case, the idea of act done ought to be utilized as boundaries to break down whether the supposed adolescent was equipped for getting his demonstration or not. In addition, the meaning of grievous violations, ought to be reexamined. Simply placing a limit of discipline as far as years doesn't mirror the outlook of criminal and doesn't convey the aggravation of the person in question.