The 3 bills named as:

• The farmers produce trade and commerce (promotion and facilitation) bill, 2020.
• The farmers (empowerment and protection) agreement on price assurance and farm service bill, 2020.
• The essential commodities (amendment) bill, 2020.

First bill permits hindrances free intra and highway exchange of homestead produce and already, the ranch produce was sold at told discount markets or mandi's controlled by horticultural produce market board (APMC)

Each agrarian produce market advisory group has authorized agents who used to purchase from ranchers as the value set in the sale prior to offering it to the global purchasers like retailers and large merchants.

New framework- Now the progressions has been finished by the public authority and now ranchers are having the choice to dispose of the mediators to whom ranchers utilized sold their produce. They can wipe out and can sell straightforwardly to the worldwide purchasers at cost to be concurred between them.

Presently ranchers’ bunch are fighting since ranchers’ bunch are concerned that this opens them to corporate and who have seriously haggling force can sell at greater cost and some are having more assets as contrast with little or minimal ranchers as it will profit more to huge ranchers those are having lands assets and bartering power. As 85% of ranchers in India own under two hectares of land and it will be extremely hard for them to haggle straightforwardly with the huge scope purchasers.

Farmer's objections:

• The substitute private mandi's will prompt extreme conclusion of existing APMC mandi's
• In the event that APMC get shut so ranchers won't have any choice to sell their produce then they need to sell it in private mandi's as it were.
• No assessments on private mandi's will be there and as of now 3% charges are there in APMC for purchasing and selling as because of no duties in private mandi's so privately owned businesses won't experience APMC.
• Evacuation of geological limitation are there and little rancher may think that it’s hard to benefit possibly better costs at business sectors due to imperatives of movement and capacity.
• There were no limitations on ranchers to sell somewhere else prior as well

State government concern with respect to this is that if private purchaser begins buying straightforwardly from the ranchers so government will miss out of duties that are charged at mandi's and the potential rejecting of the mandi's will jeopardize the positions of millions of laborers who work there.

2nd Bill contract farming
The subsequent bill will permit ranchers to go into the concurrence with concur firms, exporter or enormous scope purchaser to deliver the harvests at a pre concurred cost.

Presently the ranchers are concerned for this since they accept that the MSP (minimum support price) is the cost at which government buys the yield from ranchers straightforwardly and now MSP will be eliminated and there will be no administration control on the costs.

The interest of ranchers is to connect MSP to the agreement costs.

3rd Bill Hoardings
The essential commodities (amendment) bill proposes to permit financial specialists to stock food articles openly without the dread of being arraigned for accumulating however the little ranchers are not having that implies and stockrooms to store their created things into it.

The unlimited stocking will lead to artificial price fluctuation and low prices for farmers after harvest.

Demands of farmers organizations:

• The act is more ideal towards the organizations and it isn't lawfully enabling the ranchers.
• Ranchers need to reinforce the MSP and to be made a lawful right.
• Right now, 6% ranchers can get advantage of MSP's as acquirement of harvest isn't accomplished for all the yields for which MSP has been announced by the public authority.
• In APMC a few changes are required however nor its evacuation.
• The agents ought not disappear.
• Interest in agrarian area should be from government, not private area.