Corporate bodies are more corrupt and profligate than individuals, because they have more power to do mischief, and are less amenable to disgrace or punishment. They neither feel shame, remorse, gratitude nor goodwill Hazlitt-CeliaWells

The general belief in the earlier centuries was that companies couldn't be held reprehensibly liable. Legal thinkers didn't believe that companies might possess the ethical guiltiness necessary to commit crimes of intent. It had been the common intent of the people that a company has no soul, hence it cannot have actual wicked intent.

It cannot, therefore, be guilty of crimes requiring evil intentions'. However it cannot be denied that company crimes and frauds are at rife since several decades before, as long as Corporate Entities are alive. These includes criminal activity on behalf of a business concern, entailing embezzled and deceptive techniques, to get associated with the unfair advantage to that the offender isn't in the least entitled. Within the eyes of law, a company is a separate legal entity.

It's established through a method of registration and legislation. Compared to the people, this situation is such the companies have currently become way more dangerous criminals than the traditional voters. But, there's no correct methodology to penalize the crimes of those companies.

The most reason why the companies are successful to flee the prosecution is barely as a result of the intention to commit criminal act of the corporation has invariably been unable to be verified. Moreover, a company cannot be confined and therefore the last downside is, in each case the court needs physical presence of the wrongdoer at the time of thehearing.

However, Under Section 11 of the Indian Penal Code 1860, a Company is additionally enclosed within the definition of the term person. Therefore, just in case corporation commits any crime it may be chastened beneath IPC. But, before that it is important to know about most significant out of all the thought , that a company cannot be chastened for acts like rape as a result of the sole penalty for that crime is,imprisonment.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India through its numerous judgments has time and again tried to resolve the difficulty of Corporate Criminal Liability in India. Within the landmark case ofAssistant Commissioner vs. Velliappa Textiles Ltd, (2003) 11 SCC 405the Supreme Court commanded that, just in case Corporation cannot be confined , they will even be not prosecuted for the offence that's chastened with imprisonment beneath IPC.

It had been then after the Velliappa case that companies became additional dreamy, thinking that, being a juristic person they can not be chastened simply and sent to jail, and, they committed such a big amount of crimes throughout the course of the utilization. It had been unfair on the part of the judiciary to permit a company freely with noneliability.

Thereafter, in the case ofStandard Chartered Bank vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2005 SC 2622the Hon'ble Supreme Court overruled the Velliappa case and declared that, a Corporation cannot be let free merely because it imposes imprisonment for its criminal act.

In case where, it imposes imprisonment, it should be punished with fine. Thereafter inIridium India Ltd. Vs. Motorola Incorporated(2011) 1 SCC 74, it had been expressly held that the corporations are punished under both common law and statutory law similar to an individual. It is because; a corporation is controlled and managed by a person.

It acts through a person. Therefore, a court should punish a corporation with such punishment, which it would have given to a person on commission of such offence. Even, if corporation cannot be punished for certain acts, the authority acting on behalf of it ispunished.

It has been time and again reiterated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India that for the relevancy of the ism of Corporate Criminal Liability, the criminal act of the employer or employee should be committed with the intention of benefiting the corporation in some manner and be committed with the intention of accelerating their own personal gain, that consequently ends up in the advantage of the corporation that it is not otherwise entitledto.

Conclusion
There are numerous crimes committed by the companies that we have a tendency to bump into daily through completely different channels of communication, that severely bring down serious harm upon the economy. Over the years, the approach to Corporate criminal liability has modified from there being no thought of liability for crimes committed by company to liability based on the identification of some persons as the main brain behind the running of the company.

India endow with for the Corporate Criminal Liability in broad terms. As noted earlier, the recent ruling of the Supreme Court of India in Standard Chartered Bank, Corporations in India may be prosecuted for nearly each penal offence that exists in any Indian statute. The Companies Act conjointly provided for criminal liability of companies yet as its administrators beneath a number of variouscircumstances.

Written By:

1. Abhay Gupta, Advocate, Kapoor & Co.
   Email: [email protected], Tele: +91 9560147929