Audit Committee: A Synergy For Effective Corporate Governance

By Rishita_011 Views: 14569

In recent decades, corporate scandals and financial Misconduct have spotlighted the necessity for robust governance mechanisms. The audit committee, as a linchpin of internal control, plays a critical role in ensuring transparency, accountability, and integrity in corporate operations. This paper explores the statutory framework governing audit committees in India under the Companies Act, 2013, while analysing their evolving role in fostering corporate governance.

The study also highlights landmark judicial pronouncements, evaluates practical challenges, and emphasizes the need for a synergistic approach among stakeholders for audit committees to function effectively.

Introduction
Corporate governance is the framework that defines the rights, responsibilities, and expectations of stakeholders in a corporation. In an era of increased financial complexity and scrutiny, governance is no longer optional—it is fundamental. Among the key pillars of this framework is the audit committee, which serves as a guardian of financial propriety. Instituted formally under the Companies Act, 2013, the audit committee is tasked with overseeing financial reporting, audit functions, and internal controls, thereby reducing the risk of corporate malfeasance.

Legal Framework under the Companies Act, 2013
The Companies Act, 2013, marks a significant departure from the earlier regime in terms of corporate governance. Sections 177 and 178 of the Act provide detailed provisions concerning the constitution and functions of the audit committee:
- Section 177(1): Mandates that every listed company and certain classes of public companies¹ constitute an audit committee of the Board. The committee must consist of a minimum of three directors, with independent directors forming the majority.
- Section 177(4): Outlines the key responsibilities, which include:
  - Oversight of financial reporting.
  - Review of the auditor's independence and performance.
  - Examination of financial statements and auditor's report.
  - Approval or any subsequent modification of related party transactions.
  - Scrutiny of inter-corporate loans and investments.
These provisions are aligned with the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, ensuring harmonization between corporate law and securities regulations.
Audit Committee: Composition and Qualitative Aspects
Beyond legal compliance, the effectiveness of the audit committee hinges on its composition and functioning. Ideally, the members should have a sound understanding of finance, accounting, and the business environment.
- The Chairperson of the audit committee should be an independent director with adequate expertise in financial matters.
- Under SEBI regulations, at least one member must have accounting or related financial management expertise².
- The committee should exhibit:
  - Skepticism
  - Inquisitiveness
  - A willingness to challenge executive management
Role in Strengthening Corporate Governance
The audit committee serves as a bridge between management, external auditors, and the board. It has emerged as a keystone in promoting:
- Transparency: By reviewing financial statements and disclosures, the committee ensures stakeholders are provided with accurate and timely information.
- Accountability: Regular interaction with auditors and internal teams helps ensure that financial irregularities are detected and addressed early.
- Ethical Conduct: With oversight over whistleblower mechanisms and compliance programs, the committee promotes a culture of integrity.
Case Study: Satyam Scandal (2009)
The collapse of Satyam Computers highlighted the failure of corporate governance despite having an audit committee in place. The committee failed to detect fictitious assets and inflated profits due to a lack of due diligence. This case prompted legislative and regulatory reform, leading to more stringent provisions under the 2013 Act.
Challenges in Implementation
Despite their critical role, audit committees face numerous challenges in fulfilling their mandate:
- Information Asymmetry: Often, management controls the flow of information, impeding the committee's oversight capacity.
- Lack of Expertise: Smaller companies struggle to attract qualified independent directors with requisite financial expertise.
- Time Constraints: Audit committee members often serve on multiple boards, limiting the time they can dedicate to each company.
- Tokenism: In some instances, audit committees exist merely for regulatory compliance without meaningful engagement.
These challenges underscore the need for continuous training and a culture that respects the autonomy of the audit committee.
Judicial Perspective and Case Laws
Indian courts have recognized the importance of audit committees in ensuring financial probity:
- N. Narayanan v. SEBI (2013)³: The Supreme Court upheld SEBI's decision against fraudulent financial disclosures, highlighting the board's and committee's duty to act diligently.
- Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. SEBI (2022)⁴: The SAT reiterated that audit committees are not ceremonial bodies but have a fiduciary responsibility toward shareholders.
These cases affirm that an inactive or negligent audit committee could be held accountable for lapses in governance.
Comparative Outlook
Globally, audit committees are enshrined in corporate governance codes, such as:
- Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 2002 (USA): Requires public companies to have fully independent audit committees with financial experts.
- UK Corporate Governance Code: Emphasizes the role of the audit committee in maintaining integrity in financial reporting.
India's framework aligns well with these global norms, but enforcement remains the critical differentiator.
Recommendations for Strengthening Audit Committees
- Capacity Building: Regular training programs for committee members to update their financial and regulatory knowledge.
- Enhanced Disclosure: Transparent reporting of audit committee proceedings in annual reports.
- Performance Evaluation: Annual review of audit committee effectiveness by independent consultants or the board.
- Technology Integration: Use of audit management software to track issues, actions, and risks more effectively.

Moreover, empowering committees with whistleblower intelligence and internal control audits can enable them to act proactively.

Conclusion
The audit committee is not merely a regulatory requirement; it is a strategic asset in ensuring ethical business conduct and financial discipline. When empowered, trained, and functioning with autonomy, audit committees act as true custodians of corporate governance. As businesses become more complex, the synergy between law, practice, and intent will determine whether audit committees fulfill their transformative potential.

End Notes:

As per Rule 6 of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014, public companies with:
- Paid-up capital of Rs. 10 crores or more;
- Turnover of Rs. 100 crores or more; or
- Aggregate outstanding loans, debentures, and deposits exceeding Rs. 50 crores
are required to constitute an audit committee.
Regulation 18 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015.
N. Narayanan v. SEBI, (2013) 12 SCC 152.
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. SEBI, Appeal No. 70 of 2022 (Securities Appellate Tribunal).