"The only constant in life is change." --
Heraclitus
In a world increasingly driven by technology, change is not just inevitable;
it's essential. The judiciary is not an exception in a time when technology
controls practically every element of our lives.
A new era of digital justice has been ushered in by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of
India, which has exercised its plenary power under Article 142 of the
Constitution by ordering courts to implement e-courts and virtual hearings. This
historic action was taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic's unprecedented
challenges, but it has since evolved into much more than an immediate solution.
It is an understanding that justice needs to change with the times in order to
remain just, fair, inclusive and accessible to every individual.
The former chief justice of India, Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde, also emphasized
on the revolutionary potential of technology in the legal system in his speech
at the Supreme Court Vidhik Anuvaad Software (SUVAS) launch in 2019. He pointed
out that by tasks that require manual labor and are repetitive in nature which
tend to increase case pendency, the use of cutting-edge technologies like AI
could ensure that this process becomes more convenient, faster and feasible to
all the stakeholders including parties, lawyers and the judges.
But, The question of how this change will affect India's justice system in the
future emerges as courts and legal systems quickly adjust to online platforms.
In a rapidly changing digital world, this blog will examine the emergence of
virtual courts, their pros and cons, challenges and wider repercussions for the
legal system.
The E-Court Evolution
In India, the development of e-Courts signifies a revolutionary change in the
legal system with the goal of expanding access to justice and boosting the
effectiveness of court proceedings. Virtual courts gained traction in India with
the establishment of the first virtual court at Tis Hazari Court in Delhi on
July 26, 2019.
With the introduction of the National Policy and Action Plan for Implementation
of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in the Indian justice system
in 2005, the idea of e-Courts in India was formally established. The objective
was to transform the legal system by using technology to improve service
delivery and expedite processes.
In 2010, the first phase of the eCourts Mission Mode Project was approved, and
it was subsequently initiated with the goal of computerizing district and
subordinate courts nationwide.
Phase I of the e-Courts project started the journey by establishing the
foundation for digital integration.
More than 14,000 district and subordinate
courts had computerized by 2015, offering the fundamental framework required to
handle case files and expedite information access. During this first stage,
crucial tools such as Case Information Software (CIS) and court websites were
introduced, enabling litigants and attorneys to monitor case statuses and
schedules online.
Phase II increased the judiciary's digital infrastructure and was introduced in
2015 with a budget of ₹1,670 crores. Geographic constraints and delays brought
on account of the court backlogs were reduced when video conferencing was
implemented for remote hearings. Additionally, web portals and mobile apps were
created, increasing the accessibility of judicial services and facilitating the
easy tracking of case progress by litigants.
To fully digitize the judiciary, Phase III was approved in 2023. In order to
streamline legal procedures, this phase focuses on going paperless, digitizing
court records, and putting in place universal e-filing and payment systems. This
also facilitated the open court principles.
Further in order to ensure speedy proceedings, the judges would also be equipped
with powerful tech-based tools that are automated and can ensure that it
enhances the process of going through huge and bulky court records by providing
advanced summaries of case-files.
In the case In
Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation (2020), the Supreme
Court took suo motu cognizance of the challenges litigants faced in timely
filing of cases in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Court extended the
statute of limitations for all cases with effect from March 15, 2020, until any
further notice.
This action reaffirmed the notion that "Justice delayed is justice denied" and
demonstrated the value of virtual courts in guaranteeing that justice is served
promptly. Thus, over a period of time the e-courts have evolved in the Indian
Judicial System from being a temporary solution during the pandemic time to an
integral part of courtrooms.
A New Era Of Accessibility To Justice
India's legal system is now more inclusive and effective since the introduction
of virtual courts, which have helped usher in a new era of accessibility to
justice.
Virtual courts have several significant pros, including:
-
Speedy Justice: The efficiency of the legal process in terms of both time and money is one of the biggest benefits of virtual courts. In the landmark case of Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar, the Supreme Court of India acknowledged the fundamental right to a speedy trial as a crucial component of justice, underscoring the importance of prompt delivery of justice.
Prolonged trial delays, the Court noted, go against the fundamental constitutional values of justice and fairness. The implementation of virtual courts is consistent with this idea, guaranteeing that justice is served promptly and enabling cases to be heard more quickly and affordably.
-
Open Courts and Transparency: The principle of an open court ensures transparency and accountability by allowing the public to observe court proceedings. Jeremy Bentham argued that "the more openly a judicial proceeding is conducted, the less likely it is to be corrupted". Virtual courts uphold this principle by making hearings accessible online, enabling people to follow cases remotely. Thus, anyone can be a part of the proceeding from the convenience of their homes and exercise their fundamental right.
-
Increased Flexibility and Convenience: Virtual courts provide more scheduling flexibility. The process is less stressful and more flexible for litigants and attorneys because they can participate in hearings from the convenience of their homes or offices. Moreover, through the expedited resolution of disputes, this aids in the reduction of the backlog of cases, a significant problem in India's judicial system.
-
Electronic Operations: By enabling electronic filing and case management, virtual courts lessen their dependence on paper records. In addition to being more environmentally friendly, this expedites case processing because digital records are easier to access than physical files.
When Technology Fails Justice
Although e-courts have many benefits, they also present some serious challenges.
One of the primary problems is the digital divide, which restricts access to
justice for those without internet facilities or contemporary technology by
preventing them from taking part in virtual hearings.
This issue is especially common in low-income and rural areas, where digital
infrastructure is still in its infancy. Since people do not have access to even
basic amenities to live a stable life, the idea of a virtual system of judiciary
becomes a utopian vision.
Further, Privacy is another issue. Confidential information must frequently be
shared via digital platforms for virtual hearings, increasing the possibility of
data breaches or unauthorized access. In the absence of strong cybersecurity
safeguards, privacy of the parties and the lawyers may be jeopardized, eroding
the trust in these systems. Again the vulnerable population of rural areas
having no knowledge about these systems are more susceptible to face privacy
infringements and threat to cybersecurity.
Moreover, Virtual courts though accessible may sometimes jeopardize the process
of justice especially when it comes to criminal proceedings. For instance, the
ability to assess a witness's demeanor, crucial for evaluating credibility.
Unlike in-person testimony, video conferencing may distort non-verbal cues, such
as facial expressions and gestures. Delayed streaming or limited visibility can
obstruct the discovery of truth, especially during cross-examination, affecting
witness reliability as it might not be clearly visible through an online
platform.
The Future Prospects
Virtual courts have enormous potential for the future and could change the way
justice is delivered in previously unthinkable ways.
A combination of in-person and virtual hearings, known as hybrid courtrooms, may
become prevalent giving parties the option to be present in person or virtually
depending on the urgency, nature of the case, or convenience. This adaptability
will guarantee a more inclusive system that meets the needs of lawyers and
parties especially in the rural areas.
On September 11, 2020, the Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances,
Law, and Justice released its report listing important suggestions for
incorporating virtual courts into India's legal framework. The Committee
acknowledged the digital divide and suggested working with private organizations
to supply equipment in remote locations as well as mobile video conferencing
services.
It demanded that the National Broadband Mission be implemented more quickly in
order to close the connectivity gap. It also called for the development of
skills through advocate training programs and computer courses in legal
education. Overall, The report supported the continuation of virtual hearings
for specific cases and appellate tribunals and advocated for live streaming to
ensure transparency.
Conclusion
Virtual courts mark a fundamental change in the administration of justice,
moving beyond a short-term trend. In addition to improving efficiency and
guaranteeing that justice can be served promptly, they have brought the judicial
system closer to the people and made legal proceedings more open, affordable,
and transparent.
Issues like the digital divide and privacy concerns still exist, but the
development of safe, easily navigable, and user-friendly platforms promises a
time when virtual courts will provide a quicker, more equitable, and more
inclusive legal system, bridging gaps and guaranteeing justice for everyone,
irrespective of financial or geographic constraints.
However, the future of virtual courts remains uncertain, posing a significant
question as to "whether technology will actually replace or strengthen the
conventional courtroom?" But one thing is clear: the digital revolution in
justice is inevitable, and whether it complements or transforms the courtroom,
it will make justice faster, more accessible, and more inclusive for all.
Also Read:
Comments