The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (JJ Act, 2015),
lays down a comprehensive legal framework for addressing the needs of children
in various vulnerable situations, including those who are victims of crime,
witnesses, or in conflict with the law. Central to the effective implementation
of this Act is the crucial role assigned to the Child Welfare Police Officer (CWPO).
Mandated under Section 107(1) of the JJ Act, 2015, this designated officer acts
as a vital bridge between the police force and the unique needs of children
within the juvenile justice system.
Section 107(1) of the JJ Act, 2015, mandates the designation of a CWPO in every
police station. Specifically, it states that "in every police station, at least
one officer, not below the rank of an assistant sub-inspector, may be designated
as the Child Welfare Police Officer." This legal provision underscores the
legislature's commitment to ensuring that a trained and sensitive officer is
readily available at the primary law enforcement level to address child-related
issues. While the phrasing "may be designated" might suggest a degree of
discretion, the overarching spirit and context of the JJ Act, 2015, strongly
imply a mandatory obligation to have a CWPO in each police station to
effectively fulfil the Act's objectives.
The designation of a CWPO is not merely a matter of assigning rank; it
necessitates specific qualifications and dedicated preparation. The Act
emphasizes that the designated officer must possess "aptitude, appropriate
training and orientation to deal with children." This specialized training is
paramount as it equips the CWPO with the essential skills to navigate the
complexities of child psychology, understand child rights, and apply the
specific legal provisions of the JJ Act, 2015, in a child-friendly manner. This
training likely encompasses areas such as effective communication with children,
building trust and rapport, understanding the impact of trauma, and the legal
procedures specific to juvenile justice.
The primary and exclusive responsibility of the CWPO, as outlined in Section
107(1), is "to exclusively deal with children either as victims or
perpetrators." This focused approach is a cornerstone of the JJ Act, 2015,
ensuring that children are not subjected to the often-intimidating and
potentially traumatizing environment and procedures designed for adult
offenders. By having a designated officer specifically tasked with handling
cases involving children, the Act aims to create a more sensitive and supportive
interface between law enforcement and young individuals. The CWPO acts as a
crucial point of contact who can communicate effectively with children,
understand their perspectives, and safeguard their rights throughout any
interaction with the police.
Furthermore, Section 107(1) explicitly requires the CWPO to function "in
co-ordination with the police, voluntary and non-governmental organisations."
This collaborative mandate recognizes that addressing the multifaceted needs of
children requires a multi-agency approach. Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
often possess specialized expertise in child protection, rehabilitation, and
support services. Their partnership with the CWPO strengthens the overall
support system available to children, ensuring a more holistic and
child-centered approach to justice and care. This synergy allows for the pooling
of resources, knowledge, and expertise to better serve the best interests of the
child.
Section 107(3) of the JJ Act, 2015, further underscores the importance of
continuous professional development for CWPOs by mandating "special training,
especially at induction as Child Welfare Police Officer, to enable them to
perform their functions more effectively." This provision highlights the
legislature's recognition that effectively dealing with children in vulnerable
situations requires specialized skills that need to be developed and honed
through targeted training programs. This induction training equips newly
designated CWPOs with the foundational knowledge and skills necessary for their
crucial role.
Expanding the scope of dedicated child protection within law enforcement,
Section 107(4) of the JJ Act, 2015, explicitly includes "Railway police dealing
with children" within the ambit of the Special Juvenile Police Unit (SJPU). This
inclusion acknowledges the particular vulnerability of children in transit and
ensures that even within the railway network, there are designated personnel and
units equipped to address their specific needs and provide necessary assistance.
Both the Government Railway Police and the Railway Protection Force, when
dealing with children in situations covered by the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015,
fall under its purview and are considered part of the Special Juvenile Police
Unit. The Act ensures that children encountered within the railway environment
receive the same protections and considerations as those in other jurisdictions.
These legal provisions emphasize a significant paradigm shift embodied in the JJ
Act, 2000 (the predecessor to the 2015 Act) and carried forward in the current
legislation. It highlights the pioneering concept of the police transitioning
into "an agent of welfare for children," moving beyond a purely law enforcement
role to encompass a more protective and supportive stance, especially towards
children in need of care and protection or those in conflict with the law. The
establishment of the term "Child Welfare Officer" (evolving to CWPO) is a
groundbreaking step aimed at fostering a dedicated and specialized police
response to the unique challenges presented by cases involving children.
Complementary to the JJ Act, 2015, the Juvenile Justice Rules, 2016, further
elaborate on the operational aspects of child welfare within the justice system.
Rule 86 lays down detailed provisions regarding the constitution and functioning
of the SJPU (Special Juvenile Police Unit) in every district and city by the
respective State Governments. This rule outlines the structure,
responsibilities, and coordination mechanisms for the SJPU, reinforcing the
crucial role of the CWPO within this specialized unit. Furthermore, Rule 89(4)
makes specific provision for the training of social workers involved in the
juvenile justice system, recognizing the importance of a multi-disciplinary
approach to child welfare. The CWPO should also co-ordinate with the
Sub-divisional Legal Services Authority (SDLSA) District Legal Services
Authority (DLSA) to provide legal aid to children.
The directive within the JJ Rules, 2016, mandating that Child Welfare Police
Officers (CWPOs) should, wherever feasible, interact with children in plain
clothes stems from a profound understanding of child psychology and the inherent
power imbalance in interactions with law enforcement. The visual cues associated
with a police uniform can inadvertently trigger feelings of fear, anxiety, or
intimidation in children, particularly those who have experienced trauma or are
in vulnerable circumstances. By opting for plain attire, the CWPO aims to
dismantle these psychological barriers, fostering a more relaxed and
approachable environment conducive to open communication and trust-building.
This subtle yet significant measure prioritizes the child's comfort and
emotional well-being, recognizing that a non-threatening demeanour can
facilitate a more honest and forthcoming exchange of information, crucial for
effective intervention and support. The caveat "as far as possible" acknowledges
the practical realities of police work, where uniforms might be necessary in
certain operational contexts, but the underlying principle remains to prioritize
a child-friendly approach whenever circumstances allow.
The complementary provision stipulating that only a woman CWPO shall deal with a
girl child underscores the critical importance of gender sensitivity in child
protection. This rule acknowledges the unique vulnerabilities and potential
sensitivities that girl children may experience, particularly in situations
involving abuse, exploitation, or neglect. Providing a female officer to
interact with a girl child can create a safer and more comfortable space for
disclosure, potentially mitigating feelings of shame, embarrassment, or fear
that might arise when communicating with a male officer.
This gender-specific approach respects cultural norms and individual
preferences, recognizing that a girl child might feel more at ease and better
understood when interacting with another woman. By ensuring that female CWPOs
handle cases involving girl children, the JJ Rules, 2016, aim to foster trust,
encourage open communication, and ultimately facilitate a more effective and
sensitive process of support, investigation, and justice tailored to the
specific needs of the girl child.
Although the JJ Act of 2015 envisioned a vital role for Child Welfare Police
Officers (CWPOs) and aimed to promote progressive child welfare, the police
department faces several obstacles in effectively implementing the Act's
provisions due to limitations surrounding CWPOs. One major problem is the uneven
allocation and importance given to CWPOs across different police stations.
Despite the Act requiring their presence, many stations either don't have a
designated officer or assign the role as an extra task to an officer who is
already swamped with responsibilities. Consequently, the CWPO may lack the
necessary time, resources, or specialized attention needed to manage cases
involving children properly.
Moreover, the mandated "aptitude, appropriate
training and orientation" varies significantly in terms of quality and
consistency. Inadequate training can leave CWPOs unprepared to deal with the
sensitive nature of child-related cases, understand child psychology, or
navigate the intricacies of the JJ Act, potentially leading to procedural errors
and compromising the child's best interests.
Systemic issues within the police force also create significant obstacles. A
lack of proper sensitization and awareness among the general police force
regarding child rights and the specific provisions of the JJ Act can hinder the
CWPO's work. This can manifest as a lack of cooperation between departments,
with other officers potentially handling child-related cases without the
necessary sensitivity or adherence to the Act's guidelines.
Furthermore, the
mandated collaboration with NGOs and other stakeholders often encounters
difficulties in practice due to a lack of established coordination systems,
mutual suspicion, or differing approaches. These challenges are further
compounded by inadequate infrastructure, shortage of manpower, insufficient
logistical support, and a heavy caseload, all of which impede the CWPO's ability
to provide timely and effective assistance to children in need, ultimately
undermining the goals and spirit of the JJ Act, 2015.
The illegal nomination of police officers below the statutorily mandated rank of
Assistant Sub-Inspector (ASI) as Child Welfare Police Officers (CWPOs) in
certain districts starkly highlights a critical lapse in the implementation of
the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. This practice, often driven by a shortage of
eligible officers or a lack of comprehensive understanding and adherence to the
Act's specific directives, directly contravenes the explicit provisions of
Section 107(1).
By entrusting this sensitive and specialized role to officers lacking the
requisite experience, authority, and potentially the specific training
associated with the ASI rank, the very purpose of having dedicated and qualified
CWPOs is undermined. This not only compromises the legal safeguards intended for
children interacting with the police but also risks mishandling of cases,
potential re-traumatization of child victims, and a failure to apply the
child-friendly procedures envisioned by the Act.
The underlying reasons for such illegal nominations - namely, the paucity of
police officers and a lack of awareness regarding the JJ Act's stipulations -
point to systemic weaknesses within the police force and its training
mechanisms. Inadequate staffing can lead to the delegation of crucial
responsibilities to lower-ranking personnel, regardless of their specific
training or suitability for handling child-related issues.
Furthermore, insufficient dissemination and training on the nuances of the JJ
Act, particularly at the grassroots level, can result in a lack of understanding
about the mandatory qualifications for a CWPO. This situation underscores the
urgent need for enhanced recruitment, capacity building, and sensitization
programs within the police department to ensure strict compliance with the JJ
Act's provisions and to guarantee that children consistently receive the
specialized care and protection they are entitled to from appropriately ranked
and trained Child Welfare Police Officers.
In conclusion, the Child Welfare Police Officer serves as a linchpin in India's
Juvenile Justice System, as envisioned by the Juvenile Justice (Care and
Protection of Children) Act, 2015, and elaborated upon by the Juvenile Justice
Rules, 2016. This specially designated and trained officer—ranked not below an
Assistant Sub-Inspector—is mandated to exclusively handle cases involving
children, whether as victims or as individuals in conflict with the law, in a
sensitive and child-friendly manner.
Often working in plain clothes and supported by female officers when attending
to girl children, the Child Welfare Police Officer collaborates with the police,
NGOs, and even railway police in fulfilling this crucial role. However, the
effective realization of this role is significantly hindered by challenges such
as inconsistent designation, inadequate training, systemic issues within the
police force, and the unlawful appointment of lower-ranking officers.
These shortcomings urgently call for comprehensive reforms, including enhanced
staffing, rigorous training, improved inter-agency coordination, and strict
adherence to legal mandates, to transform the police into true agents of child
welfare and ensure that all children receive the protections and considerations
envisioned under the juvenile justice system.
Written By: Md.Imran Wahab, IPS, IGP, Provisioning, West Bengal
Email:
[email protected], Ph no: 9836576565
Comments