The rapid evolution of digital technologies has significantly altered the landscape of content distribution, particularly in the realm of broadcasting and media rights. The legal system faces increasing challenges in responding to the complexities of digital copyright infringement, where online platforms and pirated streaming services threaten the legitimate business interests of content owners. One such dispute, titled Star India Private Limited vs Crichd.Pk (CS(COMM) 840/2024) in the Delhi High Court, deals with the infringement of broadcasting rights related to the ICC Women’s T20 World Cup 2024, which is being aired on the plaintiff’s OTT platform, Disney + Hotstar. This case sheds light on the dynamic legal remedies required to combat copyright violations in the fast-changing digital environment.

Factual Background of the Case:
In the case of Star India Private Limited vs Crichd.Pk, the plaintiff, Star India Private Limited, is the exclusive broadcaster of the ICC Women’s T20 World Cup 2024 on its OTT platform, Disney + Hotstar. Star India contended that the defendant, Crichd.Pk, a rogue website engaged in unauthorized streaming of live cricket matches, was broadcasting the T20 World Cup without the required permissions or licenses. The defendant’s infringing activities deprived Star India of legitimate revenues and undermined their exclusive broadcasting rights.

Crichd.Pk is known for operating outside traditional legal jurisdictions, making it difficult to enforce copyright laws directly. The unauthorized streaming of live sports events is a major concern for content creators and broadcasters who invest heavily in securing exclusive digital broadcasting rights. The live nature of sporting events, especially T20 cricket, further complicates enforcement due to the ephemeral and time-sensitive nature of the content.

Legal Issues and Infringement Allegations:
The plaintiff’s key allegation revolves around copyright infringement under the Copyright Act, 1957, which protects both the broadcasting rights and the communication to the public rights of the content owner. By illegally streaming the live matches of the ICC Women’s T20 World Cup 2024, Crichd.Pk violated Star India’s exclusive right to broadcast and distribute the content on its digital platform.

Additionally, Star India argued that the rogue website's actions amounted to passing off, where viewers might be misled into believing that the unauthorized stream had some affiliation with or endorsement from the legitimate broadcaster. The plaintiff sought injunctive relief from the court to stop the defendant’s infringing activities and prevent further damage to their business and reputation.

Interim Injunction: A Time-Sensitive Remedy:
Due to the time-sensitive nature of T20 matches, where games are typically completed in a few hours, the plaintiff argued that the delay in granting an interim injunction could result in irreparable harm. Once a match is broadcast illegally, the monetary damage and loss of exclusive viewership rights are immediate and often irreversible. The plaintiff established a prima facie case for granting an interim injunction, emphasizing that without immediate court intervention, the ongoing infringement would lead to significant financial losses and undermine their business interests.

Evolving Digital Environment:
The case underscores the unique challenges posed by the evolving digital landscape. The rise of the internet, coupled with sophisticated technologies enabling live streaming, has created new avenues for content piracy. Rogue websites like Crichd.Pk operate with impunity by hosting their servers in foreign jurisdictions, making it difficult for courts to effectively enforce orders.

Furthermore, the issue of mirror websites complicates enforcement, as infringing sites can easily change their domain names or set up alternative websites to continue their illegal activities. The dynamic and decentralized nature of the internet presents jurisdictional challenges, requiring legal remedies to be flexible and adaptive.

Application of Dynamic Injunction in This Case:
The court, in Star India Private Limited vs Crichd.Pk, granted a dynamic injunction against the rogue website, prohibiting it from engaging in any further infringing activities. The court also directed Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to block access to the infringing website and any other mirror sites that might be created to broadcast the ICC Women’s T20 World Cup without authorization. This form of adaptive remedy reflects the court’s acknowledgment of the rapid technological advancements that allow infringers to circumvent traditional injunctions and continue their activities in different formats.

Conclusion:
The case of Star India Private Limited vs Crichd.Pk serves as an important reminder of the need for dynamic legal remedies in today’s evolving digital landscape. As online copyright infringement becomes more sophisticated, courts must adopt flexible and forward-looking approaches to enforce intellectual property rights effectively. Through the application of dynamic injunctions and the collaborative efforts of ISPs and search engines, the legal system can adapt to the complexities of the digital age while safeguarding the interests of legitimate content owners.

Case Citation: Star India Private Limited vs Crichd.Pk; 30.09.2024: CS(COMM) 840/2024:Delhi High Court: Mini Pushkarna, H.J.

Disclaimer:
The information shared here is intended to serve the public interest by offering insights and perspectives. However, readers are advised to exercise their own discretion when interpreting and applying this information. The content herein is subjective and may contain errors in perception, interpretation, and presentation.

Written By: Advocate Ajay Amitabh Suman, IP Adjutor - Patent and Trademark Attorney
Email: [email protected], Ph no: 9990389539