The advent of technology and the proliferation of various broadcasting media have significantly transformed the landscape of information dissemination. This research paper delves into the intricate domain of broadcasting rights, a subset of copyright law often referred to as 'neighboring rights'. These rights, coupled with the rise of webcasting and online streaming, bring forth a plethora of challenges that warrant comprehensive exploration.

Broadcasting rights play a pivotal role in the context of freedom of expression and the propagation of ideas. They have revolutionized the way athletes compete, fans engage, and media disseminate sports content. Moreover, they fuel the financial engine of the sports industry and connect global audiences.

This paper aims to examine the legal position of broadcasting rights in different jurisdictions, namely the United States, United Kingdom, and India. It seeks to understand how these rights are envisaged by the Indian Copyright Act, 1957, the oldest existing intellectual property rights legislation in India. The study will also scrutinize the story of broadcasting rights until and after the introduction of the latest 2012 amendment in the Copyrights Act, 1957.

The research will further explore the implications of these rights and controls for individuals, society, and the state. It will also attempt to clarify the position of Indian laws with respect to the growing influence of the Internet and webcasting.

By providing a comparative analysis of broadcasting rights across different legal systems, this research aims to contribute to the existing body of knowledge and inform policy-making in this rapidly evolving field. The findings of this study could have significant implications for broadcasters, policymakers, and the general public.

What is broadcasting?

Broadcasting is the process of disseminating information from one node, known as the originator, to all other nodes in a network, typically modeled as a graph

1. It involves transmitting messages through communication lines to reach multiple recipients efficiently. Various types of broadcasting exist, such as line broadcasting allowing messages to travel along simple paths in the network.
2. Broadcasting can also involve transmitting multi-channel audio signals, distinguishing between object-based and surround audio.
3. In the realm of international communication, broadcasting extends to state-sponsored media targeting foreign audiences, with a shift towards more complex interactions involving domestic policymakers, issue publics, foreign governments, and opinion leaders.
4. Overall, broadcasting plays a crucial role in information dissemination across different types of networks and media platforms.

Context of broadcasting in India:

In India, the right to broadcasting involves complexities regarding the rights of authors and broadcasting organizations. The Indian Copyright Act defines 'broadcast' and grants broadcasting organizations broadcast reproduction rights, known as neighboring rights, due to their technical contributions in disseminating works to the public5. The country has seen significant advancements in Radio, Television, and the Internet (RTI) for educational development, bridging educational disparities and enabling global education delivery6.

However, the emergence of 4G technology and digital transmissions has raised challenges for copyright owners and authors, prompting a critical analysis of Indian laws to protect broadcasting organizations' interests7. Clarity on the definition of broadcast is crucial for determining the rights of authors and broadcasting organizations in the evolving technological landscape of India.

Regulations governing broadcasting rights in India have been a subject of significant legal activity and scrutiny, especially with the growth of the private sports broadcasting industry8. The Indian broadcasting landscape reflects a historical struggle between state control and private interests, with concerns over cultural impact and commercialization9.

The existing legal framework is being examined in light of the booming commercial and technological progress in the sector10. India's media milieu presents a complex regulatory environment, particularly in the realm of digital journalism, highlighting the need for comprehensive policies11. The country's media regulation is influenced by a delicate balance between freedom of speech and national unity, as enshrined in the Constitution12.

The Supreme Court, in the case of SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF I & B v. Cricket Association Of Bengal & Anr13, emphasized that every citizen has the right to telecast and broadcast important events through electronic media (television or radio). The government does not hold a monopoly over electronic media, as no such power is explicitly mentioned in the Constitution or prevailing laws.

Right to broadcasting in International Context:

The Rome Convention of 1961 was the first international treaty to recognize the rights of performers and broadcasters. It granted rights to the original maker of the work and recognized the rights of performers against unauthorized recording and broadcasting of their work14. However, the protection under the Rome Convention is limited to wireless transmission of analogue sounds with or without images. It does not capture transmissions via cable and satellite, and it does not take into account the technological developments that have occurred since its adoption.

The WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty defines broadcasting as the transmission by wireless means for public reception of sounds or of images and sounds or of the representations thereof. This includes the transmission of encrypted signals where the means for decrypting are provided to the public by the broadcasting organization or with its consent15. In the EU, Directive 92/100/EEC of 19 November 1992 (updated in 2006) gives broadcasting organizations the exclusive right to authorize and prohibit the fixation of their broadcasts as well as the reproduction of such fixations16.

However, the convergence of info-communication technologies and the emergence of the new digital environment have given rise to increasing opportunities for unauthorized use of broadcasts within and across borders. This has led to discussions on the need for a new treaty to better protect the rights of broadcasters.

Technological advancements in broadcasting:

Technological advancements have significantly impacted broadcasting rights in various ways,

1. Expansion of Broadcasting Platforms: The advent of digital technologies has led to the proliferation of broadcasting platforms beyond traditional mediums like radio and television. Online streaming platforms, podcasts, and digital news outlets have become prominent players in the broadcasting sector.
    
2. Changes in Content Production: Technological advancements have also impacted the methods of content production in broadcasting. From filming techniques to post-production processes, digital innovations have streamlined workflows, increased efficiency, and opened up a broader range of creative possibilities for content creators.
    
3. Challenges to Traditional Broadcasting Rights: The rise of digital media content streaming has posed new challenges to traditional broadcasting rights. Issues such as copyright infringement, piracy, and the unauthorized use of content have become more prevalent with the ease of content distribution on the Internet.
    
4. Impact on Media Laws and Regulations: The rapid evolution of broadcasting technologies has necessitated changes in media laws and regulations. Policymakers are grappling with how to adapt existing laws to the digital age and ensure that broadcasting rights are protected in the online environment.
    
5. Influence on Advertising and Marketing: Technological advancements have transformed advertising and marketing in broadcasting. With the ability to reach a global audience, broadcasters can generate significant revenue from advertising.
    
6. Implications for Human Rights: The impact of digital technologies on broadcasting rights also has implications for human rights. Issues such as hate speech, disinformation, and privacy violations have come to the fore with the widespread use of digital broadcasting platforms.

In conclusion, technological advancements have had a profound influence on the evolution and development of broadcasting rights, posing both opportunities and challenges.

Right to broadcasting in relation to freedom of speech:

The right to broadcasting, freedom of expression, and the right to privacy are interconnected under media law. Broadcasting, which involves creating and distributing content to a mass audience, is closely linked to freedom of expression, allowing individuals and organizations to share their views and information with the public. However, this must be balanced against individuals' right to privacy. The rise of digital media content streaming has posed new challenges to traditional broadcasting rights. Issues such as copyright infringement, piracy, and unauthorized use of content have become more prevalent with the ease of content distribution on the internet.

Furthermore, the impact of digital technologies on broadcasting rights also has implications for human rights. Issues such as hate speech, disinformation, and privacy violations have come to the fore with the widespread use of digital broadcasting platforms. Therefore, the interplay between the right to broadcasting, freedom of expression, and the right to privacy under media law is a dynamic and evolving area that continues to shape the landscape of media law and policy.

The right to broadcasting is closely related to the freedom of speech and expression, which is a fundamental right guaranteed by Article 19 (1) (a) of the Indian Constitution. This right includes the freedom to express one's views through any communication channel, such as print media, radio, or television.

In the context of broadcasting, this right allows citizens to use the best means available to impart and receive information. This includes having access to broadcasting or telecasting facilities. However, like all rights, this is not absolute and is subject to reasonable restrictions imposed under Article 19 (2) of the Constitution. These restrictions can be based on factors such as the security of the state, public order, decency, morality, contempt of court, defamation, incitement to an offense, and the sovereignty and integrity of India.

In essence, the right to broadcasting is a significant aspect of the freedom of speech and expression, playing a crucial role in a democratic society by facilitating the free flow of information and ideas. It is important to note that while the media has the right to express their opinions and ideas, they also have an obligation to disseminate true and accurate information.

Case Laws:
Directorate General of Doordarshan v. Anand Patwardhan 20
The case in question emerged when Doordarshan, a state-controlled broadcaster, declined to air a documentary film titled "Father, Son and Holy War," produced by the respondent. This film, which dealt with communal violence, was the third in a trilogy created by the respondent. Despite the fact that the first two films had won national awards, Doordarshan refused to broadcast them, citing potential law and order issues.The respondent successfully challenged Doordarshan's decision not to broadcast the first two films.

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's ruling that Doordarshan must broadcast the film. The court reasoned that as a public broadcaster funded by the state, Doordarshan could not refuse to air the respondent's documentary unless it met the restrictions outlined in Article 19(2).

Given Doordarshan's role as a national broadcaster and its control over public airwaves, the court ruled that it was obligated to broadcast a film that highlighted social injustices, including issues related to caste, class, and violence against women.

Odyssey Communications (P) Ltd. v. Lokvidayan Sangatana 21
In this case, the petitioner challenged the broadcast of the TV series "Honi Anhoni" on Doordarshan, arguing that it encouraged superstition and blind faith among the public. However, due to the petitioner's failure to provide any evidence demonstrating societal harm, the petition was dismissed.

The Supreme Court held that broadcasters have the right to air films on Doordarshan, provided they comply with the channel's rules and regulations. This is in line with Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, which includes broadcasting as part of the fundamental right to freedom of speech, subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2). The court equated this right to a citizen's freedom to express their views through other mediums, such as newspapers, periodicals, advertisement holdings, and so on. This right is only subject to reasonable restrictions as per Article 19(2) of the Constitution.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, the right to broadcasting is a fundamental aspect of the freedom of speech and expression, as enshrined in Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. This right, which allows individuals and organizations to share their views and information with the public, is subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2) based on factors such as the security of the state, public order, decency, morality, and the sovereignty and integrity of India.

The rise of digital media has introduced new challenges to traditional broadcasting rights, including issues related to copyright infringement, piracy, and unauthorized use of content. Furthermore, the widespread use of digital broadcasting platforms has brought forth issues such as hate speech, disinformation, and privacy violations.

Case laws such as Directorate General of Doordarshan v. Anand Patwardhan and Odyssey Communications (P) Ltd. v. Lokvidayan Sangatana have further clarified the scope and limitations of the right to broadcasting. These rulings have emphasized the role of broadcasters in disseminating true and accurate information, and the obligation of state-controlled broadcasters to air content that highlights social injustices, subject to the restrictions outlined in Article 19(2).

Therefore, while the right to broadcasting plays a crucial role in facilitating the free flow of information and ideas in a democratic society, it must be exercised responsibly and in accordance with the law. This dynamic interplay between the right to broadcasting, freedom of expression, and the right to privacy continues to shape the landscape of media law and policy.

Reference:

1. M., P., GONÇALVES. "International broadcasting." null (2023).:233-249. doi: 10.4337/9781802207323.00024
2. Frances, L., Scoy., Lisa, L., Kovalchick. "Broadcasting in cycles with chords." null (2008). doi: 10.33915/ETD.2708
3. Lee, Yong, Ju., Lee, Tae, Jin., Kang, Kyeong, Ok., Kim, Jin, Woong., Ahn, Chie, Teuk. "Broadcasting transmitting and reproducing apparatus and method for providing the object audio." null (2018).
4. Jeoung, Byung, Chul. "Broadcasting apparatus capable using for both main broadcasting and local broadcasting." null (2007).
5. Divya, Subramanian. "The Milieu of Broadcasting Rights: An Indian Perspective." Social Science Research Network, null (2009).
6. M., Sakthivel. "Is it Broadcast or Broadcasting." Social Science Research Network, null (2011).
7. S., Arulchelvan., D., Viswanathan. "Radio, Television and the Internet providing the Right to Education in India." null (2008).
8. Sriram, Kilapakkam. "Sports Broadcast Regulation and India." null (2008).:365-380. doi: 10.1163/EJ.9789004161528.I-570.112
9. Kanchan, Kumar. "Mixed Signals Radio Broadcasting Policy in India Broadcasting in our country continues to be governed by two archaic legislations and regulated through an assortment of laws that have been scripted as expedient measures to tackle high priority short-term demands. There exists no comprehensive policy that takes into account the contradictory pulls surrounding broadcasting in India." null (2003).
10. Divya, Subramanian. "The Milieu of Broadcasting Rights: An Indian Perspective." Social Science Research Network, null (2009).
11. Vibodh, Parthasarathi., Vibodh, Parthasarathi., Simran, Agarwal. "Rein and Laissez Faire: The Dual Personality of Media Regulation in India." Digital journalism, 8 (2020).:797-819. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2020.1769493
12. Arun, Mehta. "Media Regulation in India." 25 (1998).:109-112. doi: 10.1080/01296612.1998.11726555
13. 1995 SCC (2) 161
14. Gupta, Shree. "Rights of Performers and Broadcasters Rights under Copyright Act, 1957." LawBhoomi, 11 May 2021, lawbhoomi.com/rights-of-performers-and-broadcasters-rights-under-copyright-act-1957/
15. Lau, Kok Keng. "Protection of Rights of Broadcasting Organizations." WIPO Regional Workshop on Opportunities and Challenges in the Implementation of the Beijing and Marrakesh Treaties, 29 Apr. 2015, Singapore. Presentation.
16. European Broadcasting Union. "Broadcasters' Rights: Towards a New WIPO Treaty." European Broadcasting Union, Dec. 2021, www.ebu.ch
17. "Hickin, Ruth. 'How Are Today's Biggest Tech Trends Affecting Human Rights?' World Economic Forum, 12 Dec 2017, www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/12/how-are-today-s-biggest-tech-trends-affecting-human-rights/. Accessed 23 May, 2024"
18. "Impact of Digital Technologies - UN75." United Nations, un.org/en/un75/impact-digital-technologies. Accessed 23rd May, 2024.
19. "The Future of Human Rights and Digital Technologies." Human Rights 75 High-level Event: Roundtable, 12 Dec. 2023, 10:30am-12:30pm CET, United Nations, www.ohchr.org
20. (2006) 8 SCC 433
21. (1988) 3 SCC 410