A shift from a retrospective to a prospective and projective epistemological position is proposed for legal education, one that incorporates technological knowledge and quantitative methodologies while still placing a strong emphasis on the need to teach students creative problem-solving, effective communication, and traditional normative skills that are highly valued by the legal profession.

It is suggested that students be encouraged to develop their creativity and communication skills through coding in higher education programs. However, in order to tackle the ethical concerns surrounding the use of AI in the classroom, a regulation should be put in place. Last but not least, it's clear that AI isn't going to soon replace lawyers, but schools still have a responsibility to warn students that AI could one day replace some jobs so that they can focus on the ones that really can't be automated.

Legal professionals can benefit from AI because it can automate mundane tasks, streamline research, and provide insights based on data. The use of this technology can improve a lawyer's efficiency and output, freeing them up to concentrate on higher-level, more valuable tasks.

In conclusion, artificial intelligence (AI) is a potent tool that can supplement and improve a lawyer's capacities, but it cannot supplant the distinct knowledge, experience, and discretion that human attorneys offer to the field. An interdependent partnership between AI and human lawyers is necessary for the field's smooth adoption of AI.