Blood On The Purple Vein: An Overview Of The Ongoing Journey Of Menstrual Leave In India
The paper is dedicated to examining the complex and evolving landscape of
menstrual leave policies in India, with a particular focus on recent advances,
including the significant Kerala High Court hearing on the 'Right of Women to
Menstrual Leave and Free Access to Menstrual Health Products Bill, 2022'. It
also looks at the remarkable menstrual leave policy introduced in Bihar in 1992,
which has made significant progress in recognising menstrual health as a
critical facet of women's well-being in the Indian context. Drawing lessons from
Bihar's pioneering 1992 policy, this paper highlights its influence as a
benchmark for other Indian states, further underscored by its origins as a
response to sustained women's protests, highlighting the potential of grassroots
activism in shaping progressive workplace policies.
Going beyond mere examination, this paper assesses the practical effectiveness of such policies and offers insights into their real-world implications. It examines the experiences of countries such as Japan, South Korea and China where menstrual leave policies have been implemented, exploring the benefits of improved menstrual health and women's overall well-being, while acknowledging potential challenges such as discrimination in the workplace.
The paper underlines the significance of normalizing conversations about menstruation in light of changing cultural norms by exploring the entrenched stigma attached to menstruation in India, often leading to women hesitating to use menstrual leave. The paper emphasizes the urgent requirement for comprehensive menstrual leave policies that go beyond simply allowing women time off work. The importance of introducing strong public policies that enforce paid menstrual leave is emphasized, playing a critical role in destigmatizing menstruation and challenging the conventional taboos surrounding it.
Introduction
In the natural course of life, over half of the world menstruates at one time or another, but you'd never know it, isn't that strange? This profound observation encapsulates the paradoxical silence that shrouds menstruation, a universally shared experience yet often steeped in stigma and discomfort. [1]Menstruation is not merely a biological phenomenon; it's a complex interplay of physical and emotional challenges that women grapple with monthly. [2]For around 20% of women worldwide, this period brings with it a barrage of debilitating symptoms ranging from excruciating cramps to nausea, profoundly affecting their everyday lives. Shockingly, an estimated 25 million women suffer from endometriosis, a condition where menstrual pain is so severe that it can be likened to having a heart attack, according to Professor [3]John Guillebaud.
In recent years, however, there has been a significant paradigm shift in societal attitudes towards menstruation, manifesting in policies aimed at acknowledging and addressing the unique challenges faced by menstruating individuals. [4]One such progressive initiative gained ground in Bihar nearly three decades ago. In 1992, after months of relentless struggle, women government employees in Bihar achieved a groundbreaking victory: they were granted two days of period leave per month, up to the age of 45.
This milestone marked the inception of menstrual leave policies in India, a testament to the tenacity and determination of these women. Despite this historic achievement, the battle for menstrual dignity did not garner widespread attention.[5]The implementation of period leave policies across all departments remained a challenge. Even today, there is a continuous fight to remind everyone of the importance of circulating and implementing this policy in all sectors.
Fast forward to the present, against the backdrop of these historical struggles, Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan announced a groundbreaking policy in January. The state government declared menstrual leave for female students in all state universities, following the footsteps of the courageous stand taken by the Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT). This decision, rooted in the government's commitment to realizing a gender-just society, [6]signifies a significant milestone in acknowledging the pain and discomfort that menstruating individuals often endure.
It is a continuation of the journey initiated by the women of Bihar, a step toward inclusivity and accommodation in educational institutions and workplaces.However, as commendable as these initiatives are, there exist challenges intertwined with the implementation of menstrual leave. In a traditional society like India, where menstruation remains a taboo subject, the fear persists that menstrual leave might inadvertently become another excuse for discrimination. [7]
The experiences of countries like South Korea and Japan, which have similar laws but witness a decline in the number of women availing them due to social stigma, serve as cautionary tales. Additionally, there's the risk of [8]medicalizing a natural biological process, potentially deepening existing biases against women. Furthermore, concerns about the financial and productivity costs of mandatory period leaves might make employers hesitant to hire women, perpetuating gender disparities in the workforce.[9]
The ongoing journey of menstrual leave in India is thus a complex tapestry woven with progressive policies, legal decisions, and societal attitudes. [10]It signifies a crucial step towards inclusivity and accommodation in workplaces and educational institutions. Yet, it also highlights the need for nuanced conversations, addressing deeply ingrained taboos, and creating an environment where menstruating individuals are not only supported but also respected.
As India [11]navigates this path towards gender equality and menstrual dignity, it becomes imperative to balance [12]legal frameworks with cultural sensitivities, ensuring that [13]menstrual leave becomes a symbol of empowerment rather than a cause for further discrimination. The struggle continues, echoing the voices of the brave women who fought for this basic right in Bihar, reminding the world that the fight for [14]menstrual dignity is far from over.
In Japan Under their labour law, have explicitly stated under [17]Article 68 that When a woman for whom work during menstrual periods would be especially difficult has requested leave, the employer shall not employ such woman on days of the menstrual period. However, the implementation of these policies posed challenges. In a society where menstrual leave could be construed as a tool for discrimination, women's advocates faced an uphill battle.
The struggle echoed in [18]South Korea, where the enactment of menstrual leave legislation in 1953, although a significant step, faced practical challenges, leaving the law at odds with reality. Cultural hesitancy to claim benefits and reluctance to discuss menstruation openly persisted, hampering effective implementation. The narrative found echoes in diverse corners of the globe. In Australia, the Victorian Women's Trust made headlines in 2017 by enacting a progressive paid menstrual leave policy, acknowledging the impact of menstruation on women's productivity and well-being. Meanwhile, Zambia's unique provision of "mother's day" showcased a cultural acknowledgment of women's roles as primary caregivers, albeit raising questions about true gender equality.Russia, with its 2013 [19]proposal for menstrual leave legislation, revealed a societal struggle to take menstruation-related issues seriously.
Lawmaker Mikhail Degtyaryov's proposition aimed at providing greater workplace protections for menstruating women, but it was met with ridicule. Human rights campaigners dismissed the proposal as absurd, highlighting the prevailing attitude that menstruation was considered a minor, temporary impediment akin to a hangover.
Indonesia, [20]on the other hand, appeared progressive on paper, offering two days of menstrual leave per month for female employees. This policy seemingly aligned with the country's broader leave provisions, [21]reflecting a cultural acceptance of time taken away from work. However, the practical implementation raised concerns. Despite major companies [22]like Nike and Adidas adopting the policy, women in these workplaces faced humiliating practices, highlighting the disconnection between [23]policy and reality. These experiences [24]mirrored the challenges faced in other nations, such as Zambia.
In the corporate realm, multinational giants like [25]Nike embraced menstrual leave policies, demonstrating a commitment to gender inclusivity. Yet, these policies, while progressive, reflected a broader issue: the absence of standardized governmental regulations. In the United States, where paid menstrual leave is left to the discretion of employers, Nike's initiative highlighted a glaring gap in the legal framework, leaving millions of menstruating individuals without institutional support. The global landscape of [26]menstrual leave policies is a mosaic of progress and challenges.
Cultural norms, societal attitudes, and historical biases continue to shape the implementation and acceptance of such policies. [27]The Italian parliamentary attempt in 2013 to introduce menstrual leave legislation faltered, exposing deeply ingrained prejudices and practical concerns. The duration of [28]leave proposed, a staggering thirty-six days annually, raised questions about the feasibility of integrating such extensive leave into the existing workforce structures. [29]The juxtaposition of these international scenarios illuminates the complexity of menstrual leave policies.
While legal provisions [30]might exist on paper, the implementation often falls short, leading to instances of humiliation and discrimination. [31]These incidents underscore the urgent need for more than just policy changes. Cultural attitudes, workplace practices, and societal perceptions must undergo significant transformation to truly honor the dignity and rights of menstruating individuals worldwide.
The journey toward meaningful menstrual leave [32]policies demands not just legal reform but a profound shift in societal norms, fostering environments where women are respected, supported, and empowered, regardless of their menstrual status. [33]Despite the progress made by several countries and corporations, the global discourse around menstrual leave remains complex. It intertwines issues of gender equality, workplace productivity, cultural perceptions, and legislative viability. In the global landscape of menstrual leave policies, instances like Nike and Adidas [34]
implementing Indonesian laws in their sweatshops initially appeared as progressive strides toward inclusivity. However, beneath the surface, a stark reality persisted. [35]Women in these workplaces faced undignified and humiliating experiences, exemplified by the demeaning practice of being asked to prove their menstruating status by pulling down their pants-a stark reminder of the challenges women continue to face even with the existence of such policies.
The journey from [36]Aristotle's antiquated beliefs to modern-day policy debates illustrates a transformative shift in the way society perceives menstruation. However, the road ahead demands comprehensive, empathetic, and culturally sensitive solutions. As the world grapples with these challenges, the [37]conversation around menstrual leave stands as a testament to the broader struggle for gender equality, societal acceptance, and the recognition of the fundamental dignity of every individual, regardless of their gender or physiological differences. [38]
Zambia's unique provision of "mother's day" exemplified cultural attitudes toward women's roles as primary caregivers. While this policy reflected a certain acknowledgment, it also raised questions about [39]true gender equality. [40]This phenomenon hinted at a larger global issue: the perception that menstrual leave policies might reinforce traditional gender roles rather than challenging them. In a world striving for genuine gender equality, such policies, though well-intended, risk perpetuating existing disparities. The [41]juxtaposition of these international scenarios illuminates the complexity of menstrual leave policies.
While legal provisions might exist on paper, the implementation often falls short, leading to instances of humiliation and discrimination. [42]These incidents underscore the urgent need for more than just policy changes. Cultural attitudes, workplace practices, and societal perceptions must undergo significant transformation to truly honor the dignity and rights of menstruating individuals worldwide. [43]The journey toward meaningful menstrual leave policies demands not just legal reform but a profound shift in societal norms, fostering environments where women are respected, supported, and empowered, regardless of their menstrual status.
In the realm of menstrual leave, these constitutional articles hold significant implications. Firstly, [46]menstrual leave is categorized under affirmative action policies permitted by Article 15(3), acknowledging women's distinct needs during menstruation, a natural biological process. [47]Secondly, addressing historical disadvantages, menstrual leave provides essential support and rest for women during their menstrual cycle, countering societal imbalances and promoting gender equality in the workplace.
Thirdly, menstrual leave laws, derived from Article 15(3), ensure that women are not disadvantaged at work due to their biological functions. [48]By granting paid leave for menstruation, it upholds women employees' dignity, fostering their equal participation in the workforce. Moreover, recognizing the direct link between menstrual health and overall well-being, menstrual leave aligns with the broader constitutional guarantee of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21.
Despite challenges arising from societal taboos, Article 15(3) serves as the constitutional bedrock for menstrual leave legislation, highlighting India's commitment to gender equality, women's health, and their active involvement in society and the workforce. [49]The landmark case of menstrual leave in Bihar exemplifies this commitment, showcasing a significant step toward societal acceptance and normalization of menstrual leave, further reinforcing India's dedication to the well-being and equal rights of its female population.
Some concerns likely included fears about increased absenteeism or potential discrimination against women in the workplace. Moreover, societal attitudes toward menstruation often involved stigma and discomfort, making it difficult to openly discuss or implement policies related to menstrual health.
In 1992, Bihar became one of the first states in India to introduce menstrual leave, a move seen as progressive, especially considering the socio-cultural norms prevailing at the time. [52]The decision to implement menstrual leave in Bihar was influenced by the recognition of the unique challenges women face during menstruation and the need to provide them with necessary support and rest. This initiative coincided with Lalu Prasad Yadav's tenure as the Chief Minister of Bihar, a period marked by significant social and political changes in the state. Lalu Prasad Yadav, the leader of the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), served as the Chief Minister of Bihar from 1990 to 1997.
During his tenure, the implementation of menstrual leave took place in 1992. [53]The move aimed to address the biological needs of women and was indicative of Yadav's attempts to bring about social reforms in Bihar. However, despite the well-intentioned nature of the policy, it faced numerous challenges in its acceptance and implementation. One of the primary obstacles was the deeply entrenched stigma associated with menstruation in Indian society.
Cultural taboos and traditional beliefs often led to menstruation being viewed as impure or shameful, making it difficult to openly discuss policies related to menstrual health. This stigma created resistance among both employers and employees, hindering the effective implementation of menstrual leave. Additionally, the lack of clear guidelines and formalized structures in the policy made it challenging for employers to implement menstrual leave consistently. The absence of comprehensive awareness campaigns to challenge societal norms further limited the impact of the policy.
Despite the efforts of the government, societal attitudes and practices continued to pose significant barriers to the acceptance of menstrual leave. While the Bihar Menstrual Leave Act of 1992 laid the foundation for acknowledging menstrual health as a workplace concern, its impact remained limited during that period due to these prevailing societal attitudes and practical challenges. [54]However, it did set a precedent and became an essential starting point for future discussions and initiatives related to menstrual health and workplace policies in India.
In Bihar, the implementation of the Menstrual Leave Act of 1992 was not merely a top-down decision; it also saw the emergence of grassroots movements led by women advocating for their rights. [55]However, the impact of these movements was overshadowed by larger national issues, such as the Ram Mandir dispute and the Mandal Commission, which consumed the country's attention and political discourse during that period. [56]While the Menstrual Leave Act was a step forward for women's rights in Bihar, women at the grassroots level actively campaigned for its effective implementation. [57]These grassroots movements, often led by local women's organizations, activists, and concerned individuals, aimed to raise awareness about the Act's provisions, promote its acceptance, and fight against the societal stigma associated with menstruation. [58]
Women participated in rallies, awareness campaigns, and community discussions, advocating for their right to avail menstrual leave without fear of discrimination. However, the impact of these grassroots movements was severely limited due to the national political climate of the time. The early 1990s witnessed intense socio-political upheaval, with the Ram Mandir issue triggering religious tensions and the Mandal Commission report sparking nationwide debates on caste-based reservations. These issues captured the nation's attention, leading to a polarization of public discourse.
Consequently, the efforts of women in Bihar advocating for the effective implementation of the Menstrual Leave Act struggled to gain widespread traction amidst the larger political turmoil. The intense focus on these national issues overshadowed the grassroots movements in Bihar, diverting attention and resources away from local women's rights issues, including menstrual leave. Despite the determination and resilience of these women-led movements, their voices were drowned out by the national narrative, making it challenging for their demands to receive the attention and support they deserved. In this challenging environment, the grassroots movements in Bihar faced an uphill battle.
Despite their struggles, their efforts laid the groundwork for future advocacy and awareness initiatives related to women's rights and menstrual health. The overshadowing of their movement by national issues highlighted the complexities of advocating for localized women's issues in the midst of larger political and social debates, underscoring the need for sustained efforts to address these crucial matters effectively.
In addition to addressing the immediate concern of menstrual leave, the bill also proposed improved amenities, such as flexibility to take leave and alternatives like working from home, to create a more supportive environment during menstruation. Importantly, the bill extended these benefits to female students of class VIII and above in government-recognized schools, recognizing the menstrual challenges faced by young girls as well. However, despite its progressive intent, the bill faced mixed reviews and considerable debate. Some welcomed it as a much-needed initiative to eliminate the stigma surrounding menstruation and provide essential support to women. [63]
Others, however, questioned its legality and potential discriminatory nature. In this context, the bill's alignment with the Indian Constitution, particularly Article 15, became crucial. Article 15 prohibits discrimination based on various grounds, including sex, and includes a specific provision, Article 15(3), allowing for special laws or provisions to be made for the protection and upbringing of women and children. The Menstruation Benefits Bill, 2017, thus, found its constitutional basis in this provision.
It aimed to bridge the existing gaps by recognizing the inherent physical differences and maternal functions that often place women at a disadvantage, making their physical well-being a matter of public interest. The bill, in essence, demonstrated the state's commitment to its constitutional duty, ensuring that laws are not only non-discriminatory but also equitable. By recognizing women's specific needs during menstruation and attempting to legislate in favor of their health and well-being, the bill aimed to empower women in society.
While the bill had not been enacted into law at the time, its existence and the debates surrounding it contributed significantly to the ongoing dialogue about menstrual health, gender equality, and the importance of acknowledging the unique challenges faced by women in the workplace. In this context, it represented a progressive move by India, emphasizing the country's dedication to addressing the needs of its female population and promoting a more inclusive and supportive society.
The Menstruation [64]Benefit Bill of 2017 stood as a watershed moment in the realm of women's rights in India, especially concerning menstrual health. At its core, the bill aimed to address a fundamental issue: the specific challenges faced by women during menstruation. By proposing a provision for two days of paid menstrual leave every month, the bill [65]recognized the biological realities that affect women's ability to work during this period. This provision, along with the establishment of improved amenities for rest at workplaces during menstruation, demonstrated a progressive approach toward acknowledging and accommodating women's unique health needs.
Additionally, the bill mandated that every establishment having fifty or more employees should have a creche, addressing the practical challenges faced by working mothers. However, the bill faced its share of challenges and criticisms. The societal stigma surrounding menstruation posed a significant hurdle. The deeply rooted cultural taboos in [66]Indian society often led to menstruation being viewed as impure or shameful, making it difficult to openly discuss policies related to menstrual health. Additionally, the bill faced opposition from some quarters, with concerns about increased absenteeism and potential disruptions in the workplace.
While the bill had not been enacted into law by the time of its proposal, its existence sparked [67]conversations, paving the way for further discussions and advocacy around menstrual health in the workplace and educational institutions. Importantly, the bill laid the groundwork for future legislative initiatives, including the Right of Women to Menstrual Leave and Free Access to Menstrual Health Products Bill, 2022. This subsequent bill, building upon the foundation laid by its predecessor, aimed to further empower women by not only providing menstrual leave but also ensuring free access to menstrual health products, a move that acknowledged the financial burden associated with menstrual hygiene. In essence, the Menstruation Benefit Bill of 2017, despite its challenges, was a pioneering effort.
It brought the conversation around menstrual health into the public sphere, challenging societal norms and advocating for the rights and dignity of women in India. Its existence and the subsequent bills indicate a growing awareness and acceptance of the importance of menstrual health, emphasizing the need for inclusive policies that address the specific needs of women in various spheres of life. The Menstrual Benefit Bill of 2017, a pivotal legislation presented in the Indian Parliament, addresses a critical aspect of women's health and employment rights. This groundbreaking bill seeks to provide working women in both private and public sectors with paid menstrual leave of two days every month, recognizing the unique challenges women face during menstruation.
The bill emphasizes the importance of self-perception of menstruation, empowering women to manage their health and well-being. Additionally, it mandates that establishments provide thirty minutes of rest period twice a day for women employees during menstruation, further promoting their physical and mental well-being. Crucially, the bill also underscores the significance of raising awareness among women about the benefits they are entitled to under this Act. It places the onus on establishments to inform women employees about the provisions of the Act at the time of their initial appointment, ensuring that every woman understands her rights regarding menstrual leave.One of the essential aspects of the Menstrual Benefit Bill of 2017 is its approach to addressing grievances.
The bill mandates that the Internal Complaints Committee constituted under the [68]Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013, or similar Grievance Redressal Committees within the establishment, handle grievances related to menstrual leave. [69]This provision ensures a systematic and effective mechanism for addressing women's concerns, promoting a safe and supportive work environment It criminalizes denying menstrual leave to a woman, obstructing her entitlement to such leave, or denying prescribed rest and recreation facilities during menstruation. Violations of these provisions can lead to imprisonment and fines, emphasizing the seriousness with which the legislature views the protection of women's rights in the workplace.
The bill stands as a testament to [70]India's commitment to gender equality and women's well-being in the workplace. By providing paid menstrual leave, ensuring rest periods, and emphasizing awareness and support, the bill aims to eradicate the stigma associated with menstruation and create a more inclusive and supportive work environment for women. Certainly, the recent decision by the Kerala higher education department to grant menstrual leave for students in government-run higher educational institutions marks a significant leap forward in the realm of women's rights and education in India. This new policy essentially allows female students to attend their semester exams with a 2% concession in attendance, recognizing the challenges they might face during their menstrual days, aligning with a global push for period equity.
In particular, the move has been lauded for its progressive stance in acknowledging the biological and health-related aspects of menstruation. [71]Menstruating individuals often encounter discomfort, pain, and even health issues during their periods, which can impact their ability to attend classes and take exams regularly. By reducing the attendance requirement, the state of Kerala is ensuring that these students do not face academic penalties due to health concerns related to menstruation.
This initiative also resonates with broader conversations around menstrual health and women's rights. Moreover, Kerala's move complements existing efforts in the state and beyond. The Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT) had previously introduced provisions allowing girls to take leave during their menstrual cycle. Such proactive steps not only validate the experiences of female students but also promote a more inclusive and empathetic educational environment.
Kerala's decision to grant menstrual leave for female students represents a vital milestone in the ongoing fight for women's rights and gender equality in India. It sets a precedent for other regions to follow, emphasizing the importance of understanding and accommodating the diverse needs of all students, regardless of their gender, during their educational journeys. This initiative stands as a testament to Kerala's commitment to fostering an inclusive, supportive, and equitable educational environment for all its students.
However, in many cases, this leave is unpaid, and women are required to use their paid time off or sick leave if they want to be compensated for the days they take off due to menstruation. The societal attitudes and workplace cultures in Japan can influence how this policy is implemented. Women feel uncomfortable taking menstrual leave due to the stigma associated with discussing menstruation openly in the workplace.
Consequently, the actual usage of menstrual leave in Japan might be lower than the policy allows due to these cultural factors. In South Korea, the menstrual leave policy allows female employees to take one day of paid menstrual leave per month. This policy was introduced in 2001 to address concerns related to menstrual pain and promote gender equality in the workplace. Unlike some other countries, South Korea does not require women to provide medical certificates or other forms of proof to avail menstrual leave.
Furthermore, a significant development in South Korea is the provision allowing the accumulation of unused menstrual leave days. [74]This means that if a woman does not use her allocated menstrual leave days in a particular month, she can carry them over to the following month. Alternatively, these unused days can be converted into monetary compensation at the end of the year. This approach acknowledges the varying nature of menstrual cycles and allows women to use their leave days more flexibly.
In Liaoning Province, female workers are granted two days of leave per month for period pain. This policy is part of a government initiative to improve women's rights in the workforce. The specific details, such as whether the leave is paid or unpaid, and whether medical certificates are required, are not mentioned in the information provided. In Anhui Province, female workers suffering from severe menstrual pain are allowed to take one to two days off every month. However, to avail of this leave, they need to present a doctor's certificate confirming the severity of their condition.
This requirement indicates a more formalized process for obtaining menstrual leave in Anhui Province compared to Liaoning. Menstrual leave policies are already in place in Shanxi and Hubei provinces, although the specific details of these policies are not provided in the information given Guangdong Province was in the process of considering menstrual leave as of the end of the consultation period on December 3.
This could also exacerbate the existing pay gap, as women availing such leave might face career setbacks and slower promotions due to perceived unreliability. Additionally, cultural norms and privacy concerns, particularly evident in China, might discourage women from actually utilizing the policy, rendering it ineffective in practice. Furthermore, there's the fear that this policy could inadvertently lead to the The stigmatization of women taking menstrual leave perpetuates gender disparities, especially in male-dominated sectors.
Critics argue that these policies might pressure women not to take leave, fearing negative consequences, undermining the purpose of menstrual leave. In South Korea, although Article 71 of the Labor Standards Law grants one day of menstrual leave per month, lack of awareness, social stigma, and workplace inefficiencies prevent women from using this entitlement. Female employees hesitate due to guilt and societal pressure, enduring pain instead. Male coworkers' lack of understanding exacerbates the problem. Absence of a substitute system adds to the challenge, leaving women with unpaid leave.
This reflects a broader issue: undervaluing women's well-being perpetuates workplace gender disparities. Addressing this requires raising awareness, dismantling stereotypes, and fostering supportive environments where women can prioritize health without judgment. Education, advocacy, and policy reforms are crucial to ensuring female workers access their rights without facing repercussions.
Prevailing Stigma In India
In India, despite progressive policies like menstrual leave in Bihar since 1992, pervasive stigma around menstruation persists, revealing a deep-seated silence that questions whether it's choice or taboo. [76]Rural regions, especially Bihar, grapple with age-old beliefs. A widow in Gopalganj faced job loss due to superstitions, highlighting traditional norms' impact. This stigma is a complex interplay of cultural, social, and economic factors. Menstruation is often shrouded in shame and secrecy.
Girls' lack of preparedness due to the absence of open conversations leads to poor menstrual hygiene, limited access to [77]sanitary products, and reproductive health risks. This silence also affects institutional spaces, leading to educational disparities and workplace discrimination. Media further perpetuates these taboos, hindering open discussions. Addressing this requires multifaceted efforts. Grassroots activism must organize workshops involving healthcare professionals and local leaders to dispel myths, fostering open dialogues.
Women's groups and NGOs empower women to advocate for menstrual health, encouraging open conversations and dispelling misconceptions. Normalizing menstrual leave involves discussing policies openly, backed by media campaigns. Reframing the narrative, celebrating menstruation as the "blood of life" flowing through the "purple vein," fosters pride. Documentaries like "Period. End of Sentence." shed light on rural Indian women's challenges, fostering empathy and understanding.
Cultural events and literature [78]celebrating menstruation challenge taboos. Lastly, making menstrual education mandatory in schools, covering biological, emotional, and social aspects, fosters an informed, respectful attitude from an early age. Through these initiatives, India can dismantle age-old taboos and create a supportive environment, empowering women to embrace their "blood of life" with pride.
Conclusion
The journey of menstrual leave in India reflects a complex tapestry of progress and challenges. While policies like Bihar's menstrual leave initiative since 1992 signify a step forward, the deep-rooted stigma surrounding menstruation persists, echoing through societal norms and institutional spaces. From rural regions like Bihar to urban settings, the silence and shame surrounding menstruation impact education, employment, and overall well-being for women. However, amidst these challenges, there's a glimmer of hope.
Grassroots activism, women's empowerment, media influence, and cultural initiatives are reshaping the narrative. The power of documentaries like "Period. End of Sentence." and grassroots campaigns is undeniable, fostering empathy and understanding. The notion of celebrating menstruation as the "blood of life" flowing through the "purple vein" signifies a cultural shift, challenging age-old taboos.
India's journey toward menstrual leave is a testament to the resilience of women and the transformative potential of awareness, education, and societal dialogue. As these conversations continue, there's a promising trajectory toward a more inclusive, supportive environment, where women can embrace their menstrual journey with pride and dignity.
End-Notes:
Going beyond mere examination, this paper assesses the practical effectiveness of such policies and offers insights into their real-world implications. It examines the experiences of countries such as Japan, South Korea and China where menstrual leave policies have been implemented, exploring the benefits of improved menstrual health and women's overall well-being, while acknowledging potential challenges such as discrimination in the workplace.
The paper underlines the significance of normalizing conversations about menstruation in light of changing cultural norms by exploring the entrenched stigma attached to menstruation in India, often leading to women hesitating to use menstrual leave. The paper emphasizes the urgent requirement for comprehensive menstrual leave policies that go beyond simply allowing women time off work. The importance of introducing strong public policies that enforce paid menstrual leave is emphasized, playing a critical role in destigmatizing menstruation and challenging the conventional taboos surrounding it.
Introduction
In the natural course of life, over half of the world menstruates at one time or another, but you'd never know it, isn't that strange? This profound observation encapsulates the paradoxical silence that shrouds menstruation, a universally shared experience yet often steeped in stigma and discomfort. [1]Menstruation is not merely a biological phenomenon; it's a complex interplay of physical and emotional challenges that women grapple with monthly. [2]For around 20% of women worldwide, this period brings with it a barrage of debilitating symptoms ranging from excruciating cramps to nausea, profoundly affecting their everyday lives. Shockingly, an estimated 25 million women suffer from endometriosis, a condition where menstrual pain is so severe that it can be likened to having a heart attack, according to Professor [3]John Guillebaud.
In recent years, however, there has been a significant paradigm shift in societal attitudes towards menstruation, manifesting in policies aimed at acknowledging and addressing the unique challenges faced by menstruating individuals. [4]One such progressive initiative gained ground in Bihar nearly three decades ago. In 1992, after months of relentless struggle, women government employees in Bihar achieved a groundbreaking victory: they were granted two days of period leave per month, up to the age of 45.
This milestone marked the inception of menstrual leave policies in India, a testament to the tenacity and determination of these women. Despite this historic achievement, the battle for menstrual dignity did not garner widespread attention.[5]The implementation of period leave policies across all departments remained a challenge. Even today, there is a continuous fight to remind everyone of the importance of circulating and implementing this policy in all sectors.
Fast forward to the present, against the backdrop of these historical struggles, Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan announced a groundbreaking policy in January. The state government declared menstrual leave for female students in all state universities, following the footsteps of the courageous stand taken by the Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT). This decision, rooted in the government's commitment to realizing a gender-just society, [6]signifies a significant milestone in acknowledging the pain and discomfort that menstruating individuals often endure.
It is a continuation of the journey initiated by the women of Bihar, a step toward inclusivity and accommodation in educational institutions and workplaces.However, as commendable as these initiatives are, there exist challenges intertwined with the implementation of menstrual leave. In a traditional society like India, where menstruation remains a taboo subject, the fear persists that menstrual leave might inadvertently become another excuse for discrimination. [7]
The experiences of countries like South Korea and Japan, which have similar laws but witness a decline in the number of women availing them due to social stigma, serve as cautionary tales. Additionally, there's the risk of [8]medicalizing a natural biological process, potentially deepening existing biases against women. Furthermore, concerns about the financial and productivity costs of mandatory period leaves might make employers hesitant to hire women, perpetuating gender disparities in the workforce.[9]
The ongoing journey of menstrual leave in India is thus a complex tapestry woven with progressive policies, legal decisions, and societal attitudes. [10]It signifies a crucial step towards inclusivity and accommodation in workplaces and educational institutions. Yet, it also highlights the need for nuanced conversations, addressing deeply ingrained taboos, and creating an environment where menstruating individuals are not only supported but also respected.
As India [11]navigates this path towards gender equality and menstrual dignity, it becomes imperative to balance [12]legal frameworks with cultural sensitivities, ensuring that [13]menstrual leave becomes a symbol of empowerment rather than a cause for further discrimination. The struggle continues, echoing the voices of the brave women who fought for this basic right in Bihar, reminding the world that the fight for [14]menstrual dignity is far from over.
Menstrual Leave; An international landscape:
In the annals of history, Aristotle, the ancient Greek philosopher, perpetuated a notion of female inferiority rooted in menstrual blood, deeming it impure when compared to male semen. This belief, steeped in centuries of patriarchal dominance, cast a shadow over the perception of menstruation, relegating it to a realm of shame and silence. Yet, the discourse around menstruation has evolved, shaping the global landscape of workplace policies and societal attitudes. Post-World War II [15]Japan emerged as a pioneering force, ushering in the era of menstrual leave policies. [16]In 1947, after years of debates, Japan established a groundbreaking policy granting women paid leave for period-related matters.In Japan Under their labour law, have explicitly stated under [17]Article 68 that When a woman for whom work during menstrual periods would be especially difficult has requested leave, the employer shall not employ such woman on days of the menstrual period. However, the implementation of these policies posed challenges. In a society where menstrual leave could be construed as a tool for discrimination, women's advocates faced an uphill battle.
The struggle echoed in [18]South Korea, where the enactment of menstrual leave legislation in 1953, although a significant step, faced practical challenges, leaving the law at odds with reality. Cultural hesitancy to claim benefits and reluctance to discuss menstruation openly persisted, hampering effective implementation. The narrative found echoes in diverse corners of the globe. In Australia, the Victorian Women's Trust made headlines in 2017 by enacting a progressive paid menstrual leave policy, acknowledging the impact of menstruation on women's productivity and well-being. Meanwhile, Zambia's unique provision of "mother's day" showcased a cultural acknowledgment of women's roles as primary caregivers, albeit raising questions about true gender equality.Russia, with its 2013 [19]proposal for menstrual leave legislation, revealed a societal struggle to take menstruation-related issues seriously.
Lawmaker Mikhail Degtyaryov's proposition aimed at providing greater workplace protections for menstruating women, but it was met with ridicule. Human rights campaigners dismissed the proposal as absurd, highlighting the prevailing attitude that menstruation was considered a minor, temporary impediment akin to a hangover.
Indonesia, [20]on the other hand, appeared progressive on paper, offering two days of menstrual leave per month for female employees. This policy seemingly aligned with the country's broader leave provisions, [21]reflecting a cultural acceptance of time taken away from work. However, the practical implementation raised concerns. Despite major companies [22]like Nike and Adidas adopting the policy, women in these workplaces faced humiliating practices, highlighting the disconnection between [23]policy and reality. These experiences [24]mirrored the challenges faced in other nations, such as Zambia.
In the corporate realm, multinational giants like [25]Nike embraced menstrual leave policies, demonstrating a commitment to gender inclusivity. Yet, these policies, while progressive, reflected a broader issue: the absence of standardized governmental regulations. In the United States, where paid menstrual leave is left to the discretion of employers, Nike's initiative highlighted a glaring gap in the legal framework, leaving millions of menstruating individuals without institutional support. The global landscape of [26]menstrual leave policies is a mosaic of progress and challenges.
Cultural norms, societal attitudes, and historical biases continue to shape the implementation and acceptance of such policies. [27]The Italian parliamentary attempt in 2013 to introduce menstrual leave legislation faltered, exposing deeply ingrained prejudices and practical concerns. The duration of [28]leave proposed, a staggering thirty-six days annually, raised questions about the feasibility of integrating such extensive leave into the existing workforce structures. [29]The juxtaposition of these international scenarios illuminates the complexity of menstrual leave policies.
While legal provisions [30]might exist on paper, the implementation often falls short, leading to instances of humiliation and discrimination. [31]These incidents underscore the urgent need for more than just policy changes. Cultural attitudes, workplace practices, and societal perceptions must undergo significant transformation to truly honor the dignity and rights of menstruating individuals worldwide.
The journey toward meaningful menstrual leave [32]policies demands not just legal reform but a profound shift in societal norms, fostering environments where women are respected, supported, and empowered, regardless of their menstrual status. [33]Despite the progress made by several countries and corporations, the global discourse around menstrual leave remains complex. It intertwines issues of gender equality, workplace productivity, cultural perceptions, and legislative viability. In the global landscape of menstrual leave policies, instances like Nike and Adidas [34]
implementing Indonesian laws in their sweatshops initially appeared as progressive strides toward inclusivity. However, beneath the surface, a stark reality persisted. [35]Women in these workplaces faced undignified and humiliating experiences, exemplified by the demeaning practice of being asked to prove their menstruating status by pulling down their pants-a stark reminder of the challenges women continue to face even with the existence of such policies.
The journey from [36]Aristotle's antiquated beliefs to modern-day policy debates illustrates a transformative shift in the way society perceives menstruation. However, the road ahead demands comprehensive, empathetic, and culturally sensitive solutions. As the world grapples with these challenges, the [37]conversation around menstrual leave stands as a testament to the broader struggle for gender equality, societal acceptance, and the recognition of the fundamental dignity of every individual, regardless of their gender or physiological differences. [38]
Zambia's unique provision of "mother's day" exemplified cultural attitudes toward women's roles as primary caregivers. While this policy reflected a certain acknowledgment, it also raised questions about [39]true gender equality. [40]This phenomenon hinted at a larger global issue: the perception that menstrual leave policies might reinforce traditional gender roles rather than challenging them. In a world striving for genuine gender equality, such policies, though well-intended, risk perpetuating existing disparities. The [41]juxtaposition of these international scenarios illuminates the complexity of menstrual leave policies.
While legal provisions might exist on paper, the implementation often falls short, leading to instances of humiliation and discrimination. [42]These incidents underscore the urgent need for more than just policy changes. Cultural attitudes, workplace practices, and societal perceptions must undergo significant transformation to truly honor the dignity and rights of menstruating individuals worldwide. [43]The journey toward meaningful menstrual leave policies demands not just legal reform but a profound shift in societal norms, fostering environments where women are respected, supported, and empowered, regardless of their menstrual status.
Constitutional framework and its implications regarding menstrual leave in India
Article 15(1) of the Indian [44]Constitution plays a foundational role in the context of menstrual leave by prohibiting discrimination based on gender, ensuring equality before the law, and equal protection of laws for all citizens. Article 15(3) is particularly crucial, granting the state the authority to make special provisions for women and children. [45]This provision recognizes the historical disadvantages women face due to biological differences, such as menstruation, and societal roles.In the realm of menstrual leave, these constitutional articles hold significant implications. Firstly, [46]menstrual leave is categorized under affirmative action policies permitted by Article 15(3), acknowledging women's distinct needs during menstruation, a natural biological process. [47]Secondly, addressing historical disadvantages, menstrual leave provides essential support and rest for women during their menstrual cycle, countering societal imbalances and promoting gender equality in the workplace.
Thirdly, menstrual leave laws, derived from Article 15(3), ensure that women are not disadvantaged at work due to their biological functions. [48]By granting paid leave for menstruation, it upholds women employees' dignity, fostering their equal participation in the workforce. Moreover, recognizing the direct link between menstrual health and overall well-being, menstrual leave aligns with the broader constitutional guarantee of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21.
Despite challenges arising from societal taboos, Article 15(3) serves as the constitutional bedrock for menstrual leave legislation, highlighting India's commitment to gender equality, women's health, and their active involvement in society and the workforce. [49]The landmark case of menstrual leave in Bihar exemplifies this commitment, showcasing a significant step toward societal acceptance and normalization of menstrual leave, further reinforcing India's dedication to the well-being and equal rights of its female population.
The Genesis of Menstrual Leave in Bihar:
In 1992, Bihar became one of the pioneering states in India to introduce menstrual leave, despite the absence of a specific legal mandate. This initiative was driven by a recognition of the unique challenges women face during menstruation and aimed to provide them with necessary rest and support. [50]Although not backed by a formal law, this policy allowed women to take a certain number of days off during their menstrual cycle without facing penalties or job insecurity. The introduction of menstrual leave in Bihar was not without challenges. Initially, there might have been resistance and skepticism surrounding this policy. [51]Some concerns likely included fears about increased absenteeism or potential discrimination against women in the workplace. Moreover, societal attitudes toward menstruation often involved stigma and discomfort, making it difficult to openly discuss or implement policies related to menstrual health.
In 1992, Bihar became one of the first states in India to introduce menstrual leave, a move seen as progressive, especially considering the socio-cultural norms prevailing at the time. [52]The decision to implement menstrual leave in Bihar was influenced by the recognition of the unique challenges women face during menstruation and the need to provide them with necessary support and rest. This initiative coincided with Lalu Prasad Yadav's tenure as the Chief Minister of Bihar, a period marked by significant social and political changes in the state. Lalu Prasad Yadav, the leader of the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), served as the Chief Minister of Bihar from 1990 to 1997.
During his tenure, the implementation of menstrual leave took place in 1992. [53]The move aimed to address the biological needs of women and was indicative of Yadav's attempts to bring about social reforms in Bihar. However, despite the well-intentioned nature of the policy, it faced numerous challenges in its acceptance and implementation. One of the primary obstacles was the deeply entrenched stigma associated with menstruation in Indian society.
Cultural taboos and traditional beliefs often led to menstruation being viewed as impure or shameful, making it difficult to openly discuss policies related to menstrual health. This stigma created resistance among both employers and employees, hindering the effective implementation of menstrual leave. Additionally, the lack of clear guidelines and formalized structures in the policy made it challenging for employers to implement menstrual leave consistently. The absence of comprehensive awareness campaigns to challenge societal norms further limited the impact of the policy.
Despite the efforts of the government, societal attitudes and practices continued to pose significant barriers to the acceptance of menstrual leave. While the Bihar Menstrual Leave Act of 1992 laid the foundation for acknowledging menstrual health as a workplace concern, its impact remained limited during that period due to these prevailing societal attitudes and practical challenges. [54]However, it did set a precedent and became an essential starting point for future discussions and initiatives related to menstrual health and workplace policies in India.
In Bihar, the implementation of the Menstrual Leave Act of 1992 was not merely a top-down decision; it also saw the emergence of grassroots movements led by women advocating for their rights. [55]However, the impact of these movements was overshadowed by larger national issues, such as the Ram Mandir dispute and the Mandal Commission, which consumed the country's attention and political discourse during that period. [56]While the Menstrual Leave Act was a step forward for women's rights in Bihar, women at the grassroots level actively campaigned for its effective implementation. [57]These grassroots movements, often led by local women's organizations, activists, and concerned individuals, aimed to raise awareness about the Act's provisions, promote its acceptance, and fight against the societal stigma associated with menstruation. [58]
Women participated in rallies, awareness campaigns, and community discussions, advocating for their right to avail menstrual leave without fear of discrimination. However, the impact of these grassroots movements was severely limited due to the national political climate of the time. The early 1990s witnessed intense socio-political upheaval, with the Ram Mandir issue triggering religious tensions and the Mandal Commission report sparking nationwide debates on caste-based reservations. These issues captured the nation's attention, leading to a polarization of public discourse.
Consequently, the efforts of women in Bihar advocating for the effective implementation of the Menstrual Leave Act struggled to gain widespread traction amidst the larger political turmoil. The intense focus on these national issues overshadowed the grassroots movements in Bihar, diverting attention and resources away from local women's rights issues, including menstrual leave. Despite the determination and resilience of these women-led movements, their voices were drowned out by the national narrative, making it challenging for their demands to receive the attention and support they deserved. In this challenging environment, the grassroots movements in Bihar faced an uphill battle.
Despite their struggles, their efforts laid the groundwork for future advocacy and awareness initiatives related to women's rights and menstrual health. The overshadowing of their movement by national issues highlighted the complexities of advocating for localized women's issues in the midst of larger political and social debates, underscoring the need for sustained efforts to address these crucial matters effectively.
The Menstruation Benefits Bill of 2017
The [59]Menstruation Benefits Bill of 2017, presented by Ninong Ering, stands as a significant step towards recognizing and addressing the unique challenges faced by women due to menstruation in the workplace. [60]This bill, introduced as a private member Bill in the Indian Parliament, aimed to provide a progressive solution by offering paid menstrual leave of two days every month to working women in both private and public sectors. [61]The primary objective was to establish gender-sensitive labor policies that acknowledge the distinctive health needs of women, ensuring that they are not penalized for a natural biological process. [62]In addition to addressing the immediate concern of menstrual leave, the bill also proposed improved amenities, such as flexibility to take leave and alternatives like working from home, to create a more supportive environment during menstruation. Importantly, the bill extended these benefits to female students of class VIII and above in government-recognized schools, recognizing the menstrual challenges faced by young girls as well. However, despite its progressive intent, the bill faced mixed reviews and considerable debate. Some welcomed it as a much-needed initiative to eliminate the stigma surrounding menstruation and provide essential support to women. [63]
Others, however, questioned its legality and potential discriminatory nature. In this context, the bill's alignment with the Indian Constitution, particularly Article 15, became crucial. Article 15 prohibits discrimination based on various grounds, including sex, and includes a specific provision, Article 15(3), allowing for special laws or provisions to be made for the protection and upbringing of women and children. The Menstruation Benefits Bill, 2017, thus, found its constitutional basis in this provision.
It aimed to bridge the existing gaps by recognizing the inherent physical differences and maternal functions that often place women at a disadvantage, making their physical well-being a matter of public interest. The bill, in essence, demonstrated the state's commitment to its constitutional duty, ensuring that laws are not only non-discriminatory but also equitable. By recognizing women's specific needs during menstruation and attempting to legislate in favor of their health and well-being, the bill aimed to empower women in society.
While the bill had not been enacted into law at the time, its existence and the debates surrounding it contributed significantly to the ongoing dialogue about menstrual health, gender equality, and the importance of acknowledging the unique challenges faced by women in the workplace. In this context, it represented a progressive move by India, emphasizing the country's dedication to addressing the needs of its female population and promoting a more inclusive and supportive society.
The Menstruation [64]Benefit Bill of 2017 stood as a watershed moment in the realm of women's rights in India, especially concerning menstrual health. At its core, the bill aimed to address a fundamental issue: the specific challenges faced by women during menstruation. By proposing a provision for two days of paid menstrual leave every month, the bill [65]recognized the biological realities that affect women's ability to work during this period. This provision, along with the establishment of improved amenities for rest at workplaces during menstruation, demonstrated a progressive approach toward acknowledging and accommodating women's unique health needs.
Additionally, the bill mandated that every establishment having fifty or more employees should have a creche, addressing the practical challenges faced by working mothers. However, the bill faced its share of challenges and criticisms. The societal stigma surrounding menstruation posed a significant hurdle. The deeply rooted cultural taboos in [66]Indian society often led to menstruation being viewed as impure or shameful, making it difficult to openly discuss policies related to menstrual health. Additionally, the bill faced opposition from some quarters, with concerns about increased absenteeism and potential disruptions in the workplace.
While the bill had not been enacted into law by the time of its proposal, its existence sparked [67]conversations, paving the way for further discussions and advocacy around menstrual health in the workplace and educational institutions. Importantly, the bill laid the groundwork for future legislative initiatives, including the Right of Women to Menstrual Leave and Free Access to Menstrual Health Products Bill, 2022. This subsequent bill, building upon the foundation laid by its predecessor, aimed to further empower women by not only providing menstrual leave but also ensuring free access to menstrual health products, a move that acknowledged the financial burden associated with menstrual hygiene. In essence, the Menstruation Benefit Bill of 2017, despite its challenges, was a pioneering effort.
It brought the conversation around menstrual health into the public sphere, challenging societal norms and advocating for the rights and dignity of women in India. Its existence and the subsequent bills indicate a growing awareness and acceptance of the importance of menstrual health, emphasizing the need for inclusive policies that address the specific needs of women in various spheres of life. The Menstrual Benefit Bill of 2017, a pivotal legislation presented in the Indian Parliament, addresses a critical aspect of women's health and employment rights. This groundbreaking bill seeks to provide working women in both private and public sectors with paid menstrual leave of two days every month, recognizing the unique challenges women face during menstruation.
The bill emphasizes the importance of self-perception of menstruation, empowering women to manage their health and well-being. Additionally, it mandates that establishments provide thirty minutes of rest period twice a day for women employees during menstruation, further promoting their physical and mental well-being. Crucially, the bill also underscores the significance of raising awareness among women about the benefits they are entitled to under this Act. It places the onus on establishments to inform women employees about the provisions of the Act at the time of their initial appointment, ensuring that every woman understands her rights regarding menstrual leave.One of the essential aspects of the Menstrual Benefit Bill of 2017 is its approach to addressing grievances.
The bill mandates that the Internal Complaints Committee constituted under the [68]Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013, or similar Grievance Redressal Committees within the establishment, handle grievances related to menstrual leave. [69]This provision ensures a systematic and effective mechanism for addressing women's concerns, promoting a safe and supportive work environment It criminalizes denying menstrual leave to a woman, obstructing her entitlement to such leave, or denying prescribed rest and recreation facilities during menstruation. Violations of these provisions can lead to imprisonment and fines, emphasizing the seriousness with which the legislature views the protection of women's rights in the workplace.
The bill stands as a testament to [70]India's commitment to gender equality and women's well-being in the workplace. By providing paid menstrual leave, ensuring rest periods, and emphasizing awareness and support, the bill aims to eradicate the stigma associated with menstruation and create a more inclusive and supportive work environment for women. Certainly, the recent decision by the Kerala higher education department to grant menstrual leave for students in government-run higher educational institutions marks a significant leap forward in the realm of women's rights and education in India. This new policy essentially allows female students to attend their semester exams with a 2% concession in attendance, recognizing the challenges they might face during their menstrual days, aligning with a global push for period equity.
In particular, the move has been lauded for its progressive stance in acknowledging the biological and health-related aspects of menstruation. [71]Menstruating individuals often encounter discomfort, pain, and even health issues during their periods, which can impact their ability to attend classes and take exams regularly. By reducing the attendance requirement, the state of Kerala is ensuring that these students do not face academic penalties due to health concerns related to menstruation.
This initiative also resonates with broader conversations around menstrual health and women's rights. Moreover, Kerala's move complements existing efforts in the state and beyond. The Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT) had previously introduced provisions allowing girls to take leave during their menstrual cycle. Such proactive steps not only validate the experiences of female students but also promote a more inclusive and empathetic educational environment.
Kerala's decision to grant menstrual leave for female students represents a vital milestone in the ongoing fight for women's rights and gender equality in India. It sets a precedent for other regions to follow, emphasizing the importance of understanding and accommodating the diverse needs of all students, regardless of their gender, during their educational journeys. This initiative stands as a testament to Kerala's commitment to fostering an inclusive, supportive, and equitable educational environment for all its students.
Menstrual Leave Implementation In China, South Korea And Japan: Pros And Cons
In [72]Japan, the menstrual leave policy is rooted in the country's Labor Standards Act, which allows women to take time off work if they are experiencing physical or mental discomfort due to menstruation. The specific details, such as the number of days allowed and whether it is paid or unpaid, can vary between companies. Some progressive companies offer paid menstrual leave to their female employees, typically ranging from one to three days per month. [73]However, in many cases, this leave is unpaid, and women are required to use their paid time off or sick leave if they want to be compensated for the days they take off due to menstruation. The societal attitudes and workplace cultures in Japan can influence how this policy is implemented. Women feel uncomfortable taking menstrual leave due to the stigma associated with discussing menstruation openly in the workplace.
Consequently, the actual usage of menstrual leave in Japan might be lower than the policy allows due to these cultural factors. In South Korea, the menstrual leave policy allows female employees to take one day of paid menstrual leave per month. This policy was introduced in 2001 to address concerns related to menstrual pain and promote gender equality in the workplace. Unlike some other countries, South Korea does not require women to provide medical certificates or other forms of proof to avail menstrual leave.
Furthermore, a significant development in South Korea is the provision allowing the accumulation of unused menstrual leave days. [74]This means that if a woman does not use her allocated menstrual leave days in a particular month, she can carry them over to the following month. Alternatively, these unused days can be converted into monetary compensation at the end of the year. This approach acknowledges the varying nature of menstrual cycles and allows women to use their leave days more flexibly.
In Liaoning Province, female workers are granted two days of leave per month for period pain. This policy is part of a government initiative to improve women's rights in the workforce. The specific details, such as whether the leave is paid or unpaid, and whether medical certificates are required, are not mentioned in the information provided. In Anhui Province, female workers suffering from severe menstrual pain are allowed to take one to two days off every month. However, to avail of this leave, they need to present a doctor's certificate confirming the severity of their condition.
This requirement indicates a more formalized process for obtaining menstrual leave in Anhui Province compared to Liaoning. Menstrual leave policies are already in place in Shanxi and Hubei provinces, although the specific details of these policies are not provided in the information given Guangdong Province was in the process of considering menstrual leave as of the end of the consultation period on December 3.
Arguments Against The Menstrual Leave Provision
The debate against implementing menstrual leave policies on an international level, as seen in countries like China, [75]Japan, and South Korea, revolves around several intertwined concerns. Critics argue that offering specific leave for menstruation might reinforce existing gender biases, making employers hesitant to hire women who could potentially take time off every month, leading to increased workplace vulnerability.This could also exacerbate the existing pay gap, as women availing such leave might face career setbacks and slower promotions due to perceived unreliability. Additionally, cultural norms and privacy concerns, particularly evident in China, might discourage women from actually utilizing the policy, rendering it ineffective in practice. Furthermore, there's the fear that this policy could inadvertently lead to the The stigmatization of women taking menstrual leave perpetuates gender disparities, especially in male-dominated sectors.
Critics argue that these policies might pressure women not to take leave, fearing negative consequences, undermining the purpose of menstrual leave. In South Korea, although Article 71 of the Labor Standards Law grants one day of menstrual leave per month, lack of awareness, social stigma, and workplace inefficiencies prevent women from using this entitlement. Female employees hesitate due to guilt and societal pressure, enduring pain instead. Male coworkers' lack of understanding exacerbates the problem. Absence of a substitute system adds to the challenge, leaving women with unpaid leave.
This reflects a broader issue: undervaluing women's well-being perpetuates workplace gender disparities. Addressing this requires raising awareness, dismantling stereotypes, and fostering supportive environments where women can prioritize health without judgment. Education, advocacy, and policy reforms are crucial to ensuring female workers access their rights without facing repercussions.
Prevailing Stigma In India
In India, despite progressive policies like menstrual leave in Bihar since 1992, pervasive stigma around menstruation persists, revealing a deep-seated silence that questions whether it's choice or taboo. [76]Rural regions, especially Bihar, grapple with age-old beliefs. A widow in Gopalganj faced job loss due to superstitions, highlighting traditional norms' impact. This stigma is a complex interplay of cultural, social, and economic factors. Menstruation is often shrouded in shame and secrecy.
Girls' lack of preparedness due to the absence of open conversations leads to poor menstrual hygiene, limited access to [77]sanitary products, and reproductive health risks. This silence also affects institutional spaces, leading to educational disparities and workplace discrimination. Media further perpetuates these taboos, hindering open discussions. Addressing this requires multifaceted efforts. Grassroots activism must organize workshops involving healthcare professionals and local leaders to dispel myths, fostering open dialogues.
Women's groups and NGOs empower women to advocate for menstrual health, encouraging open conversations and dispelling misconceptions. Normalizing menstrual leave involves discussing policies openly, backed by media campaigns. Reframing the narrative, celebrating menstruation as the "blood of life" flowing through the "purple vein," fosters pride. Documentaries like "Period. End of Sentence." shed light on rural Indian women's challenges, fostering empathy and understanding.
Cultural events and literature [78]celebrating menstruation challenge taboos. Lastly, making menstrual education mandatory in schools, covering biological, emotional, and social aspects, fosters an informed, respectful attitude from an early age. Through these initiatives, India can dismantle age-old taboos and create a supportive environment, empowering women to embrace their "blood of life" with pride.
Conclusion
The journey of menstrual leave in India reflects a complex tapestry of progress and challenges. While policies like Bihar's menstrual leave initiative since 1992 signify a step forward, the deep-rooted stigma surrounding menstruation persists, echoing through societal norms and institutional spaces. From rural regions like Bihar to urban settings, the silence and shame surrounding menstruation impact education, employment, and overall well-being for women. However, amidst these challenges, there's a glimmer of hope.
Grassroots activism, women's empowerment, media influence, and cultural initiatives are reshaping the narrative. The power of documentaries like "Period. End of Sentence." and grassroots campaigns is undeniable, fostering empathy and understanding. The notion of celebrating menstruation as the "blood of life" flowing through the "purple vein" signifies a cultural shift, challenging age-old taboos.
India's journey toward menstrual leave is a testament to the resilience of women and the transformative potential of awareness, education, and societal dialogue. As these conversations continue, there's a promising trajectory toward a more inclusive, supportive environment, where women can embrace their menstrual journey with pride and dignity.
End-Notes:
- G, Bhaghamma and Ramesh, Prof. (Dr.), "Addressing Menstrual Stigma: The Case for Implementing Menstrual Leave as a Legal Provision in India" (May 19, 2023), Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research Volume V Issue II (2023).
- Sakshi Kanodia & Bhanu Srivastava, Menstrual Leave Awakening to the New Dawn, 4 INT'l J.L. MGMT. & HUMAN. 4122 (2021).
- Hilary H. Price, Periodic Leave: An Analysis of Menstrual Leave as a Legal Workplace Benefit, 74 OKLA. L. REV. 187 (2022).
- Chothe, Vikas, Jagdish Khubchandani, Denise Seabert, Mahesh Asalkar, Sarika Rakshe, Arti Firke, Inuka Midha, and Robert Simmons. Students' Perceptions and Doubts About Menstruation in Developing Countries: A Case Study From India. Health Promotion Practice 15, no. 3 (2014): 319–26. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26740510.
- Shah, A.M. Purity, Impurity, Untouchability: Then and Now. Sociological Bulletin 56, no. 3 (2007): 355–68. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23620634.
- Hilary H. Price, Periodic Leave: An Analysis of Menstrual Leave as a Legal Workplace Benefit, 74 OKLA. L. REV. 187 (2022).
- Herrmann, M. A., & Rockoff, J. E. (2012). Does Menstruation Explain Gender Gaps in Work Absenteeism? The Journal of Human Resources, 47(2), 493–508. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23214398
- Burns, W.E. "Menstruation." In They Believed That?: A Cultural Encyclopedia of Superstitions and the Supernatural Around the World, 162–165. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2022. https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.elibrarydsnlu.remotexs.in/encyclopedia-chapter?
- Adukia, Anjali. Sanitation and Education. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 9, no. 2 (2017): 23–59. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26156194.
- Garg, Suneela, Nandini Sharma, and Ragini Sahay. Socio-Cultural Aspects of Menstruation in an Urban Slum in Delhi, India. Reproductive Health Matters 9, no. 17 (2001): 16–25. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3776394.
- Bridget J. Crawford & Emily Gold Waldman, Period Poverty in a Pandemic: Harnessing Law to Achieve Menstrual Equity, 98 Wash. U. L. REV. 1569 (2021).
- Sayed Qudrat Hashimy, Menstrual Leave Dissent and Stigma Labelling: A Comparative Legal Discourse, 5 INT'l J.L. MGMT. & HUMAN. 1270 (2022).
- Margaret E. Johnson, Menstrual Justice, 53 UC Davis L. REV. 1 (2019).
- Maham Javaid, Asian Countries Have Been Offering Females Paid Menstrual Leave for Almost 70 Years, TIMELINE (Feb. 17, 2016), https://timeline.com/asian-countries-havebeen-offering-females-paid-menstmal-leave-for-almost-70-years-401056aeb lec.
- Divya Srinivasan & Bharti Kannan, Establishing the Unconstitutionality of Menstrual Exclusion Practices in India, 41 COLUM. J. GENDER & L. 198 (2021).
- Labour Standards Law (Law No. 49 of 7 April 1947) https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/WEBTEXT/27776/64846/E95JPNO 1 .htm#a064
- Elim Kim, Korean Women's Activities for Legislation to Guarantee Gender Equality in Employment, 5 J. KOREAN L., no. 2, 2006, at 49, 53.
- Damien Gayle, Russian MP Accused of Sexism for Proposing Law Giving Women Two Paid Days Off a Month When They Are on Their Period, DAILY MAIL, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-23 82637/Russian-MP-proposes-law-giving-women-period-2-paid-days-work.html (last updated Aug. 1, 2013, 12:36 PM).
- Shailza Agarwal & Rishi Raj, Menstrual Health Rights, 3 INT'l J.L. MGMT. & HUMAN. 693 (2020).
- Nafis Adwani, Employment And Employee Benefits In Indonesia: Overview (2015) (Westlaw, Practical Law Country Q&A 0-508-0242), https://1.next.westlaw.com/508-0242?transitionType=Default (stating the law in Indonesia as of Nov. 1, 2015).
- Shailza Agarwal & Rishi Raj, Menstrual Health Rights, 3 INT'l J.L. MGMT. & HUMAN. 693 (2020).
- Indonesia Global Compliance Guide, REPLICON, https://www.replicon.com/regulation/indonesia/ (last updated July 6, 2021)
- On Women's Day, Workers Demand Longer Maternity Leave, JAKARTAGLOBE (Mar. 8, 2015), https://jakartaglobe.id/news/womens-day-workers-demand-longer-maternityleave/ ("A three-month maternity leave is not enough for female laborers to take care of their newborns because babies need to be breastfed exclusively [for a longer period]." (alteration in original)
- Claudia Polsky, Schools, Safety, and Semantics: Progress and Possibilities for Menstrual Equity, 98 N.Y.U. L. REV. ONLINE 155 (2023).
- Vrinda Aggarwal, Leave to Bleed: A Jurisprudential Study of the Policy of Menstrual Leaves, 8 J. INDIAN L. & SoC'Y 1, 5 (2017) (citing Timothy Connor, We Are Not Machines, CLEAN CLOTHES CAMPAIGN (Mar. 2002), https://cleanclothes.org/resources/publications/we-are-not-machines.pdf).
- Marian Baird, Elizabeth Hill & Sydney Colussi, Mapping Menstrual Leave Legislation and Policy Historically and Globally: A Labor Entitlement to Reinforce, Remedy, or Revolutionize Gender Equality at Work?, 42 COMP. LAB. L. & POL'y J. 187 (2021)
- Nicola Lacetera & Mario Macis, Time for Blood: The Effect of Paid Leave Legislation on Altruistic Behavior, 29 J. L. ECON. & ORG. 1384 (2013).
- Herrmann, M. A., & Rockoff, J. E. "Does Menstruation Explain Gender Gaps in Work Absenteeism?" The Journal of Human Resources 47, no. 2 (2012): 493–508. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23214398
- Belliappa, J. L. "Menstrual Leave Debate: Opportunity to Address Inclusivity in Indian Organizations." Indian Journal of Industrial Relations 53, no. 4 (2018): 604–617. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26536484.
- Bridget J. Crawford , Margaret E. Johnson , Marcy L. Karin, Laura Strausfeld & Emily Gold Waldman, The Ground on Which We All Stand: A Conversation about Menstrual Equity Law and Activism, 26 MICH. J. GENDER & L. 341 (2019).
- Jorene Ooi, Bleeding Women Dry: Tampon Taxes and Menstrual Inequity, 113 NW. U. L. REV. 109 (2018).
- Harlow, Siobán D., and Oona M. R. Campbell. Menstrual Dysfunction: A Missed Opportunity for Improving Reproductive Health in Developing Countries. Reproductive Health Matters 8, no. 15 (2000): 142–47. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3775199.
- JEYASEELAN, L., and P.S.S. RAO. Effect of Occupation on Menstrual Cycle Length: Causal Model. Human Biology 67, no. 2 (1995): 283–90. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41465075.
- PEARSON, JOANNA, and KATE MCPHEDRAN. A Literature Review of the Non-Health Impacts of Sanitation. Waterlines 27, no. 1 (2008): 48–61. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24684955.
- Gómez-Sánchez PI, Pardo- Mora YY, Hernández-Aguirre HP, Jiménez-Robayo SP, Pardo-Lugo JC. Menstruation in history. Invest Educ Enferm. 2012;30(3): 371-377.
- Levitt RB, Barnack-Tavlaris JL. Addressing Menstruation in the Workplace: The Menstrual Leave Debate. 2020 Jul 25. In: Bobel C, Winkler IT, Fahs B, et al., editors. The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies [Internet]. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan; 2020. Chapter 43. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565643/ doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-0614-7_43
- Jessica L. Barnack-Tavlaris, Kristina Hansen, Rachel B. Levitt & Michael Reno, Health Care for Women International, 40(12), 1355–1373 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2019.1639709.
- King, Sally. (2021). Menstrual Leave: Good Intention, Poor Solution. 10.1007/978-3-030-53269-7_9.
- Pascua, Eddora Janna and Biescas, Angelica and Macatangay, Gianne Faye and de Ocampo, Maria Ronneth and Sandoval, Laila Joshbeth, Menstrual Leave: Bridging the Gap for Women's Health and Workplace Equality in the Philippines (July 10, 2023). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4505008 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4505008
- Adukia, Anjali. Sanitation and Education. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 9, no. 2 (2017): 23–59. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26156194.
- Hennegan, Julie, Inga T. Winkler, Chris Bobel, Danielle Keiser, Janie Hampton, Gerda Larsson, Venkatraman Chandra-Mouli, Marina Plesons, and Thérèse Mahon. Menstrual Health: A Definition for Policy, Practice, and Research. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters 29, no. 1 (2021): 31–38. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48645238.
- Jennifer Weiss-Wolf, Menopause and the Menstrual Equity Agenda, 41 COLUM. J. GENDER & L. 228 (2021)
- Harlow, Siobán D., and Oona M. R. Campbell. Menstrual Dysfunction: A Missed Opportunity for Improving Reproductive Health in Developing Countries. Reproductive Health Matters 8, no. 15 (2000): 142–47. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3775199.
- Bhaghamma G., Addressing Menstrual Stigma: The Case for Implementing Menstrual Leave as a Legal Provision in India, 5 INDIAN J.L. & LEGAL Rsch. 1 (2023).
- Shailza Agarwal & Rishi Raj, Menstrual Health Rights, 3 INT'l J.L. MGMT. & HUMAN. 693 (2020)
- Raj, Prithivi, Implementation Menstrual Leave Policy In India: An Empirical Study (November 07, 2021). NVEO-NATURAL VOLATILES & ESSENTIAL OILS, 8(5), 2317-2322. https://www.nveo.org/index.php/journal/article/view/783, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4106585
- Simran Naik, The Need for a Menstrual Policy, 2 INDIAN J.L. & LEGAL Rsch. 1 (2021).
- Vanshika Shukla, Period Leave: Reducing Women's Pain, 5 INDIAN J.L. & LEGAL Rsch. 1 (2023).
- Priya Bhalerao & Aayush Shah, Menstrual Leave - Regressive or Progressive?, 3 INT'l J.L. MGMT. & Human. 827 (2020).
- Sakshi Kanodia & Bhanu Srivastava, Menstrual Leave Awakening to the New Dawn, 4 INT'l J.L. MGMT. & Human. 4122 (2021).
- Chothe, Vikas, Jagdish Khubchandani, Denise Seabert, Mahesh Asalkar, Sarika Rakshe, Arti Firke, Inuka Midha, and Robert Simmons. Students' Perceptions and Doubts About Menstruation in Developing Countries: A Case Study From India. Health Promotion Practice 15, no. 3 (2014): 319–26. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26740510.
- "Period Leave Debate: Women Can Dance Fine, It's the Yard That Is Skewed and Needs Correction," Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Liberation, https://cpiml.org/commentary/the-period-leave-debate-women-can-dance-fine-its-the-yard-that-is-skewed-and-needs-correction.
- Susmita Rath, Constitutional Scrutinization of Menstrual Taboos, 22 Supremo Amicus [38] (2020).
- Zia Akhtar, Scheduled Castes, Dalits and Criminalisation by 'Descent', 9 State CRIME J. 71 (2020)
- Shubhang Gomasta & Sushmita Das, The Law Governing Employment Practices in India and Positioning the Leave/Working System for the Employees, 4 INT'l J.L. MGMT. & HUMAN. 752 (2021)
- Lahiri-Dutt, Kuntala, and Kathryn Robinson. 'period Problems' at the Coalface. Feminist Review, no. 89 (2008): 102–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40663963.
- Thapa, Poornima, and Muthusamy Sivakami. Lost in Transition: Menstrual Experiences of Intellectually Disabled School-Going Adolescents in Delhi, India. Waterlines 36, no. 4 (2017): 317–38. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26600803.
- Swarnava Hati, Analysis of Menstrual Benefit Bill, 2017 and Applicability of a Menstrual Benefit Policy in India, 4 INT'l J.L. MGMT. & HUMAN. 3194 (2021).
- Tamanna Sharma, Until When Will the Menstrual Stigmas Continue? Time for Change, Time for a New Policy, 4 INDIAN J.L. & LEGAL Rsch. 1 (2022-2023).
- Margaret E. Johnson, Menstrual Justice, 53 UC Davis L. REV. 1 (2019)
- Hilary H. Price, Periodic Leave: An Analysis of Menstrual Leave as a Legal Workplace Benefit, 74 OKLA. L. REV. 187 (2022).
- Divyam Desai, Menstruation Leaves for Women: Law and Policy, 2 Jus Corpus L.J. 732 (2021).
- Vivian Eulalia Hamilton, Menstrual Justice in Theoretical Context: Reviewing Menstruation Matters: Challenging the Law's Silence on Periods, 98 N.Y.U. L. REV.Online 133 (2023).
- The Menstruation Benefits Bill, 2017 By Shri Ninong Ering, M.P.
- Antra Bhanot, Cultural Taboos and Menstruation, 2 LAW Essentials J. 38 (2021).
- Toit, Brian M. du. Menstruation: Attitudes and Experience of Indian South Africans. Ethnology 27, no. 4 (1988): 391–406. https://doi.org/10.2307/3773400.
- sexual harassment of women at workplace act 2013
- Shivi Kanskar & Debarati Pal, Reconceptualizing Sexual Harassment: Extending the POSH Act, 2013, 2 Jus Corpus L.J. 467 (2021).
- Psaki, Stephanie R., Katharine J. McCarthy, and Barbara S. Mensch. Measuring Gender Equality in Education: Lessons from Trends in 43 Countries. Population and Development Review 44, no. 1 (2018): 117–42. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26622795.
- Health Sector Policy, Financing and Privatisation. Reproductive Health Matters 19, no. 38 (2011): 213–18. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41409194.
- Jessica L. Barnack-Tavlaris, Kristina Hansen, Rachel B. Levitt & Michelle Reno. (2019) Taking leave to bleed: Perceptions and attitudes toward menstrual leave policy. Health Care for Women International 40:12, pages 1355-1373.
- Asia Society Korea. . Kotex Issue No.4: Menstrual, Maternity, and Menopause Leave - Work-Life Balance for Women in South Korea.
- International Labour Organization. (Year of Publication). Title of the Document. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/publication/wcms_618449.pdf
- Levitt RB, Barnack-Tavlaris JL. Addressing Menstruation in the Workplace: The Menstrual Leave Debate. 2020 Jul 25. In: Bobel C, Winkler IT, Fahs B, et al., editors. The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies [Internet]. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan; 2020. Chapter 43. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565643/ doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-0614-7_43
- https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00W863.pdf
- Garg S, Anand T. Menstruation related myths in India: strategies for combating it. J Family Med Prim Care. 2015 Apr-Jun;4(2):184-6. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.154627. PMID: 25949964; PMCID: PMC4408698.
- Ellen McCammon, Luciana E. Hebert, Suchi Bansal, Shirley Yan, Alicia Menendez & Melissa Gilliam. (2023) Using body mapping to explore gender with adolescents in Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Youth Studies 26:6, pages 730-751.
Law Article in India
Lawyers in India - Search By City
LawArticles
How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi
How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi Mutual Consent Divorce is the Simplest Way to Obtain a D...
Increased Age For Girls Marriage
It is hoped that the Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill, 2021, which intends to inc...
Facade of Social Media
One may very easily get absorbed in the lives of others as one scrolls through a Facebook news ...
Section 482 CrPc - Quashing Of FIR: Guid...
The Inherent power under Section 482 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (37th Chapter of t...
The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in India: A...
The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is a concept that proposes the unification of personal laws across...
Role Of Artificial Intelligence In Legal...
Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing various sectors of the economy, and the legal i...
Please Drop Your Comments