Evidentiary Value of Fingerprint Evidence:

The use of fingerprint evidence in criminal investigations is highly valued because of its exceptional and distinct features. The patterns of ridges on a person's fingertips are formed during their development in the womb and remain mostly constant throughout their lifetime. This distinctiveness makes fingerprints a dependable means of identification, as no two individuals, even identical twins, have ever been discovered to possess identical prints. Consequently, discovering a matching fingerprint at a crime scene can act as a compelling sign of an individual's participation, connecting them to a particular place or item.

During the late 1800s, doctors and scientists embarked on a journey to accumulate evidence that the arrangement of ridges on an individual's fingertips possesses not only an exclusive quality attributed solely to them but also endures unwaveringly throughout their existence. This revelation rendered fingerprints a valuable means of identification. Soon enough, these distinctive imprints became instrumental in apprehending wrongdoers and continue to serve as a crucial tool within the realm of forensic investigation in contemporary times.

In addition, the enduring nature of fingerprint traits enhances their credibility as evidence. While attributes like facial characteristics or handwriting may alter as time goes by, the essential ridges on fingerprints stay unchanged. This persistence enables forensic specialists to juxtapose hidden prints discovered at crime spots with documented prints from specific individuals, thereby furnishing a dependable means of establishing identity and linking individuals to unlawful actions.

The value of fingerprints is increased by their ability to identify individuals. When analysing fingerprints, experts not only look at the general ridge patterns but also focus on specific details like ridge endings, bifurcations, and ridge dots. These distinctive characteristics enable forensic experts to differentiate between prints, even when they are incomplete or distorted. The capability to individualize fingerprints brings an extra level of accuracy to criminal investigations, reinforcing the connection between the suspect and the scene of the crime.

Furthermore, the broad acceptance of fingerprint evidence in legal proceedings adds to its weight as evidence. Judicial authorities typically acknowledge the scientific foundation and dependability of fingerprint analysis when carried out by certified forensic specialists. The established techniques and benchmarks in fingerprint analysis, alongside the utilization of Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems (AFIS), have additionally improved the effectiveness and precision of the identification procedure. The allowance of fingerprint evidence in court emphasizes its significance as a persuasive and widely acknowledged forensic instrument.

To sum up, the value of fingerprint evidence lies in its exceptional nature, lasting presence, capability to establish individuality, and wide acceptance in legal proceedings. The scrutiny of fingerprints acts as a potent means to connect individuals with crime scenes, establish identity, and offer dependable evidence in criminal investigations. The thorough analysis of ridge patterns and minutiae points, coupled with technological advancements, enhances the overall robustness and credibility of fingerprint evidence within the framework of the criminal justice system.

It is believed that the chances of two individuals having the exact same fingerprints by mere coincidence are extremely slim, estimated to be less than one in 64 billion. Taking these odds into consideration, experts have made calculations suggesting that it would require over a million years for two people with identical fingerprints to randomly emerge within the fingerprint database at Scotland Yard.

It's quite fascinating that even though identical twins share the same DNA sequence and often look very similar, their fingerprints are still slightly different. This is because the development of fingerprints in the womb is influenced by a combination of genetic factors and environmental conditions.

Limitations of Fingerprint Evidence:

Although fingerprint evidence is commonly recognized as an essential and trustworthy tool in criminal investigations, it is important to acknowledge that it is not completely flawless. The analysis of fingerprints in forensic science, just like any other type of forensic evidence, can face obstacles that have the potential to compromise its reliability. There are various factors that contribute to circumstances where fingerprint evidence may prove unreliable.

One notable hurdle that arises is the issue of prints found at crime scenes. When fingerprints are poorly defined, smudged, or incomplete, it becomes quite challenging to obtain precise matches. The quality of the fingerprints collected can be negatively influenced by various environmental factors, such as the nature of the surface, the substances present, or the conditions prevailing at the crime scene.

Furthermore, the absence of standardized protocols for fingerprint analysis can bring about irregularities in the forensic procedure. Differences in approaches or criteria among various forensic examiners or laboratories may result in disparities in examination and understanding. This lack of consistency raises worries regarding the dependability and neutrality of fingerprint evidence.

Mistakes made by humans can be a problem when it comes to analysing fingerprints. Even though forensic experts are well-trained, they are not perfect and can make errors. These errors can happen when interpreting or identifying prints, especially when dealing with complicated patterns or partial prints. The consequences of these mistakes can greatly impact the reliability of the fingerprint evidence that is being presented.

The presence of confirmation bias poses a natural danger in the realm of fingerprint analysis. Forensic examiners, who are privy to information about a suspect's identity or the specifics surrounding a case, may unintentionally display confirmation bias. This bias has the potential to undermine the examiner's impartiality and subsequently impact the precision of the fingerprint analysis.

When we come across partial prints during forensic investigations, things get even more complicated. The presence of incomplete prints raises the chances of false positives or misidentifications. It becomes increasingly difficult to establish a definitive match with a high level of certainty, which can ultimately result in flawed conclusions.

The reliability of fingerprint evidence is heavily influenced by the contextual factors that surround it. When viewed in conjunction with other evidence, any errors or problems related to other aspects of the investigation can have an impact on the overall reliability of the fingerprint evidence. Neglecting to take into account the wider context has the potential to weaken the strength of the fingerprint evidence in a given case.

The utilization of Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems (AFIS) also brings about challenges. Although these systems are effective tools, they are not perfect. Mistakes can occur because of the constraints of the database, problems with algorithms, or instances of incorrect matches, particularly when working with large sets of data.

The importance of scientific validation cannot be overstated when it comes to establishing the credibility of fingerprint analysis methods. In certain instances, there may be inadequacies in the scientific validation of these methods, which can raise concerns about the accuracy and dependability of the analysis. It is crucial to have standardized validation procedures in place to guarantee the meticulousness and integrity of fingerprint analysis.

In addition, the absence of independent verification presents a possible difficulty. Independent verification is a fundamental aspect of the scientific method, and the lack of this vital stage or an inability to subject the analysis to peer review could undermine the overall trustworthiness of the fingerprint evidence.

During court proceedings, it is possible for legal challenges to arise. The defence has the option to question the admissibility or reliability of fingerprint evidence, thereby bringing up concerns such as chain of custody, preservation of evidence, or the qualifications of the forensic examiner. These legal challenges highlight the significance of following proper procedures when collecting, analysing, and presenting fingerprint evidence.

In closing, although fingerprint evidence continues to be a formidable asset in criminal investigations, it is not impervious to obstacles and possible mistakes. The dependability of fingerprint evidence rests on the unwavering commitment to superior methods, the proficiency of forensic analysts, and the calibre of the evidence obtained. When evaluating fingerprint evidence's significance in legal proceedings, courts must cautiously contemplate the constraints and potential hurdles that accompany it.

Fingerprint evidence is at risk of being compromised if it is not handled properly, which can lead to misidentification. Mistakes made by humans during the collection, preservation, or analysis of fingerprints can also result in inaccuracies. Moreover, there are occasional occurrences of extremely similar fingerprints between two different individuals, which can cause confusion and potential misattribution. Furthermore, the absence of universally agreed-upon standards and protocols for fingerprint analysis can contribute to inconsistencies in how the evidence is interpreted.

In Madrid, Spain in 2004, the Federal Bureau of Investigation conducted a faulty fingerprint analysis that resulted in the misidentification of Brandon Mayfield as the perpetrator of multiple terrorist attacks on commuter trains in one high-profile case. Forensic evidence emphasizes the need for courts to exercise caution and be wary of relying on scientifically unverified methods.

It is important to understand that the methods used in forensic pattern-matching are not flawless and can make mistakes. This leads to a significant number of innocent individuals being wrongfully convicted. Therefore, the court should strongly urge the state to provide any additional tangible evidence that they have, if it exists, in order to support the fingerprint evidence.

Written By: Md.Imran Wahab, IPS, IGP, Provisioning, West Bengal
Email: [email protected], Ph no: 9836576565

Also Read:

• Fingerprints: A Forensic Tool For Criminal Investigation