This research explores the important topic of digital evidence and whether it can be used in court. The study looks into how important it is for digital forensic specialists to maintain the quality and admissibility of digital evidence in legal proceedings. The admissibility of digital evidence is crucial in a world where digital technology is used more and more, but it also presents difficult obstacles.

This paper examines the complex problems surrounding the admissibility of digital evidence and the unique contribution that professionals in digital forensics may make to solving these problems. This study intends to interpret the crucial roles played by digital forensic specialists in guaranteeing the credibility and validity of digital evidence in court by examining case studies, legal precedents, and the field's changing landscape in court proceedings.

Introduction
Digital evidence is one key thing in the current digitalize world. Digital evidence, often called e-evidence, comprises information and data that hold significance in an investigation and are found on electronic devices. This type of evidence is typically linked to cybercrime or electronic. It's crucial to recognise that digital evidence is inherently more delicate and susceptible to alteration without immediate detection. Therefore, it is imperative to handle and preserve it with the utmost care to maintain its integrity and reliability in legal proceedings.

In our current digitalised world, there's a growing dependence on digital evidence, and this reliance has been steadily increasing. One of the primary reasons for this shift is the alarming rise in cybercrime. Digital evidence is highly valuable because it can be easily backed up and verified through various methods to ensure its authenticity.

Digital evidence surrounds a vast scope of activities, inclusive of data recovery, the retrieval of deleted files, and the tracking of digital artefacts. This type of evidence is instrumental in identifying the root causes of incidents, which can be particularly beneficial for the prosecution in legal cases.

However, it's major to note that the quality of digital evidence largely to be contingent on the skills and diligence of investigators. Digital evidence is more susceptible to alteration without detection, which emphasizes the need for careful handling and preservation.

Additionally, digital evidence offers the advantage of easy searching, analysis, and organisation, this facilitates professionals in quickly identifying and accessing relevant information, making it a powerful tool in modern investigations.

Literature Review
Chibuike Israel; Forensics and Digital Evidence in Cyber Crime Investigation; February 2023[1]

The influence of digital evidence in cybercrime inspection is extensive, requiring various advanced techniques to address it. This is due to the lack of tangible evidence. Digital data must be meticulously examined and analysed. The author suggests that students should be encouraged to learn about this field, with the help of extra-curricular programs. If the global community provides more digital evidence, it will aid aspiring analysts in gaining practical experience in the field.

Furthermore, there is a need to ensure that only verified processes for extracting, interpreting, and processing admissible evidence are used in cybercrime cases in a court of law.

David Mugisha; Role and Impact of Digital Forensic in Cybercrime Investigation; March 2019.[2]

In this contemporary era, technological advancements are certain to expand at an unprecedented pace. As a result, the roles of investigators are becoming increasingly complicated, demanding constant adaptation to stay abreast of evolving technology. The author of this perspective posits that in the foreseeable future, the field of digital forensics will become a foundation in a broad spectrum of investigative endeavours. This growing reliance on digital forensics is anticipated to bolster its credibility as a crucial investigative tool.

However, the author also predicts that the right to privacy will persist as a challenging and contentious issue for digital forensics.

Objective
The primary focus of this paper revolves around the relevancy and the challenges associated with digital evidence. To acquire digital evidence, various methodologies are employed, including data recovery, analysis, and tracking digital artefacts. However, these methods come with numerous challenges, such as ensuring data integrity and confidentiality, as well as the need for swift action for timely execution. The susceptibility of digital evidence to easy alteration underscores the significance of maintaining a proper chain of custody, a critical factor for its admissibility in a court of law.

In order to address these challenges effectively, professionals often collaborate closely with digital forensic experts. These experts play a pivotal part in ensuring that the digital evidence remains valid, reliable, and relevancy in legal proceedings.

Type of Digital Evidence

1. Electronic Documents: This category includes a broad variety of digital files, including spreadsheets, presentations, and text documents. In situations requiring written records, agreements, or contracts, they may be extremely important.
2. Social Media Posts: Exchanges, comments, and acts pertinent to a case can be illustrated with content from social media sites like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. In situations involving harassment, slander, or even illegal activity, this proof can often be important.
3. Digital Pictures and Videos: Visual proof can be obtained through pictures and videos taken using digital devices, such as smartphones and security cameras. They are frequently employed in criminal, conflict, and accident situations.
4. Computer Forensics: This field examines and analyses computer system data. Experts in digital forensics are able to retrieve files, browser histories, and system records. In situations involving cybercrimes, data breaches, or unlawful access, this evidence is crucial.
5. Cell Phone Records: In a miscellaneous of situations, including criminal investigations, mobile device records, such as call logs, screenshots, and location data, can be utilized to determine a person's whereabouts, communications, or affiliations.
6. Email Communication: In situations involving fraud, intellectual property disputes, or harassment, emails and the metadata they include, such as sender, recipient, and timestamps, may be used as evidence.
7. GPS Data: In situations involving personal injury, alibis, or confirming an individual's whereabouts at a specific moment, information from GPS devices or position data from smartphones may be used.
8. Social Media and Online Activity: Documents detailing an individual's online activities, history of website visits, or call logs, can be exploited as proof in court proceedings concerning cyberbullying, threats made online, or illicit activity conducted online.
9. Digital Signatures: Digital signatures can be used to demonstrate the legitimacy and agreement of parties involved in cases involving agreements or contract disputes.
10. Metadata: A document's history and an event chronology can be established with the use of metadata, which contains details about the creation and editing of digital files.
11. Cybersecurity Logs: Because they offer a trail of illegal access, data breaches, or digital incursions, logs produced by network and system security tools can be extremely useful in cybercrime investigations.
12. Voicemail and Audio Recordings: You can use voicemail and audio recordings to prove the content of a conversation or to establish facts.
13. Databases: Information contained in digital databases, such as transaction history, customer details, and financial records, may be utilized as proof in legal proceedings pertaining to fraud, commercial disputes, or regulatory compliance.
14. Blockchain Records: To prove transactions, ownership of digital assets, or the performance of smart contracts in cryptocurrency scenarios, blockchain records may be necessary.
15. Expert Testimony: To elucidate the nature and importance of digital evidence, digital forensic experts may testify in court. Their knowledge can aid juries and the court in comprehending intricate technical issues.

Legal Framework for the admissibility of Digital Evidence:

The Indian Evidence Act is pivotal for ensuring the relevancy of electronic evidence in a court of law. 3,22A,65A,65B, 85A, and 85B are particularly relevant section. Section 3 mentioned electronic records as documents, Section 65B outlines the conditions for acknowledge electronic records as evidence, and Sections 85A and 85B establish presumptions related to certain electronic records and digital signatures.

Section 22A[3] the Indian Evidence Act was introduced to address the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in court. It specifies that data generated by a computer, saved, recorded, or reproduced on optical or magnetic media, printed on paper, or contained in an electronic record will all be considered documents.This is crucial for cybercrime investigations as it allows electronic records, such as emails, chat logs, or digital documents, to be admitted as evidence in court, provided certain conditions are met.

Section 65A[4] deals specifically with electronic evidence. It declares that electronic record contents are admissible in court.

By producing a certificate signed by a person who had control over the computer, or the device whereby the electronic record was produced,at the time of its creation. This certificate should describe the manner in which the electronic record was produced, stored, or transmitted. This is crucial in cybercrime investigations because it sets the standard for presenting electronic evidence, ensuring its authenticity and reliability.

Section 65B[5] provided detailed procedures for a relevancy of electronic records. It specifies that for electronic records to be accepted, they require a certificate under Section 65(B). in court. This certificate must confirm the accuracy of the electronic data, the method of its creation, and other relevant details. It is a significant section for cybercrime investigations as it lays out the process for presenting electronic records as legal evidence.

Section 85A[6] complements Section 65B by stating that when an electronic record is produced as evidence, it is presumed to be genuine unless the opposing party can prove otherwise. This places the burden of proof on the party disputing the authenticity of electronic evidence. This provision is important in cybercrime investigations as it helps establish the reliability of electronic records, making it easier to use them in court.

Section 85B[7] a significant provision that addresses the relevancy of electronic evidence in Indian courts. This section provides specific conditions that must be met for electronic records to be admitted as evidence. To be admissible, an electronic record must be accompanied by a certificate, as per Section 65B(4), which should be signed by a government official or someone responsible for the operation of the computer or device from which the record was generated. This certificate is essential in demonstrating the accuracy and reliability of the electronic record.

Following the presentation of a certificate in accordance with Section 65B,the court may presume the authenticity of the electronic record, streamlining the process of admitting digital evidence. Failure to adhere to the requirements outlined in Section 65B can lead to electronic evidence being deemed inadmissible, emphasising the significance of proper documentation and adherence to the law when giving electronic evidence in court.

In summary, Sections 22A, 65A, 65B, and 85A of the Indian Evidence Act are crucial in the context of cybercrime investigations as they provide a law relating for the admissibility and handling of electronic records as evidence.

Information Technology Act, 2000

Section 28[8] This section is of paramount importance as it empowers the government to take necessary actions in the interest of India's integrity and sovereignty. It provides the government with the power to eavesdrop on, keep an eye on, or decode data created, sent, received, or kept in any computer resource. This authority is crucial for national security and the effective investigation and prevention of cyber threats.

Section 43A[9]: This section addresses the issue of compensation for failures in protecting data and sensitive personal information. Organisations dealing with sensitive data are mandated to implement security measures. If they fail in doing so, leading to data breaches or unauthorized access, they might be required to compensate the impacted parties. This provision underlines the significance of data protection and security in the digital age.

Section 43[10]: Section 43 outlines penalties for unauthorized actions related to computer systems and data. It covers a wide range of offences, including unauthorized access to computer systems, downloading, introducing viruses, and harming the resources of computers. These penalties serve as a deterrent against cybercrimes and provide legal consequences for offenders.

Section 80: This section empowers senior police officers or authorised government officials to enter public places, conduct searches, and make arrests without a warrant if they reasonably suspect someone of committing a cybercrime under this Act. This provision enables swift and decisive action in response to cybercrime incidents.

Judicial Precedent
State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai[11]
Fact:

• Video conferencing was permitted by the trial court; however, the High Court mandated that evidence be recorded with the accused present.
• Dr.Greenberg was prepared to testify when the prosecution asked him to provide his view, but he declined to travel to India.

Held
Electronic recordings, including video conferences, as well as oral and documentary testimony are all acceptable forms of evidence. After concluding that Evidence can be recorded through video conferencing, and that virtual presence is equivalent to physical presence under Section 273 Cr.P.C., the Supreme Court reversed the decision made by the High Court.

The officer will make sure that the respondent and his counsel are present in the video conference if the witness feels comfortable providing testimony in this manner.

Recording evidence through video conference can also fulfil the purpose of Section 273 of the Cr.P.C.

Shamsher Singh Verma v state of Haryana[12]
Fact
In this case where a nine-year-old girl alleged to have been sexually abused by her uncle, the court referred to several rulings from this court.

Held
The court held that holding that tape recordings of conversations are admissible if the conversation is relevant to the issues at hand, the voice can be recognised, and by excluding the chance of the tape record being erased, the tape record's accuracy may be proven. For this reason, the Court decided that Compact Discs qualified as "documents" under Section 3 of the Evidence Act of 1872.

N.C.T of Delhi vs Navjot Sandhu @ Afsan Guru[13]
Fact:

• On December 13, 2001, five heavily armed individuals drove a white Ambassador Car into the Parliament House compound.
• With hand and rifle grenades, automatic assault rifles, handguns, and electronic detonators, they were well armed.

Held:
The issue of dependability and reliance on prosecution-generated records was brought up by the inadmissibility of cell phone call logs produced by the public prosecution for review throughout the appeals process. The accused made the inadmissibility of the electronic data one of their main concerns. Since no prosecution certificate was needed in order to admit an electronic record in compliance with Evidence Act Section 65B(4), the records become less reliable.

If a certificate is not issued in accordance with Section 65B (2) of the Indian Evidence Act, the data provided electronically. Evidence cannot be added to, and in the absence of a " competent" witness with knowledge of the computer's functionality during printing, supplemental evidence in line with Section 63 is likewise inadmissible.

The Court decided that printouts collected mechanically from computers or servers and confirmed by an authorised service provider representative could be admitted into evidence by a witness who could confirm the signatures of the certifying officer or vouch for the facts based on personal experience. Regardless of whether Section 65B's standards regarding the admissibility of electronic data are met, there is no restriction on the admission of secondary evidence under the other provisions of the Evidence Act, notably Sections 63 and 65.

Admissibility of Digital Evidence

The digital evidence can be admissible depending on various factors such as:

1. Authenticity: The proof must be unequivocal about where it came from, attesting to the fact that it was obtained from a certain place or electronic communication device.
   • Its integrity must be guaranteed, and it must be a full and accurate copy of the obtained digital evidence.
   • Consistency and avoiding evidence taint depend on establishing an appropriate chain of custody. This chain discloses where the evidence came from and as well as everyone in charge of it at the time of acquisition. To ensure that the digital evidence hasn't been tampered with after it was acquired, there must be sufficient documentation.
2. Reliability: There are two methods that are frequently employed to evaluate the dependability of digital evidence.
   1. Assessing the regularity of operation of the electronic communication device used to gather the evidence.
   2. Verifying if the digital evidence gathered from the electronic communication equipment has been tampered with, tainted, or damaged. The collection and examination of the evidence shouldn't give rise to any questions about its veracity and validity. There should be no contamination or outside influence on the evidence.
3. Completeness: The proof must encompass all aspects of the alleged incidence, guaranteeing that it is adequate to demonstrate or refute a particular activity.
4. Relevance: Any digital evidence introduced in court must be directly related to the topics under discussion.

Challenges in Admissibility of Digital Evidence

1. Electronic evidence may be challenged as fundamentally tampered with by parties during a trial on the grounds that it has been altered. When appropriate safety measures are not followed, tampering is a serious risk. Given how simple it is to tamper with digital evidence, determining its authenticity is a significant challenge. Protections against tampering and chain of custody are essential.
2. One major obstacle to the relevancy of electronic evidence is the software's dependability, which might be contested in court.
3. It is frequently difficult to confirm the identity of the person who performed an activity using a password, PIN, or "I accept" option, which can have an impact on the admissibility and reliability of electronic evidence.
4. The inclusion of digital evidence might be complicated by hearsay laws, particularly when statements are made to substantiate the claimed truth. It is concerning when the author of word documents, emails, or SMS messages is challenged. It can be difficult to demonstrate how the author and the evidence are related.
5. Because social media networks are anonymous and allow several individuals to use a single account, it can be challenging to authenticate information from them. It can be difficult to determine who wrote a piece of content originally. Credibility concerns around digital evidence could include allegations of falsification, alteration, or manipulation.
6. The authenticity and admissibility of electronic evidence are impacted when numerous people gain access to the same device because it becomes more difficult to determine to whom a message or other content was directed.
7. The validity of information obtained through social media sites, considering the in court, the frequency of phone accounts and excessive sharing may be contested. The swift advancement of technology poses difficulties when evaluating the dependability of novel digital evidence formats.
8. Local Network Data: When several computers share a network, it can be challenging to assign activities to particular devices and times, which might have an impact on the admissibility of electronic evidence.
9. Internet Data Variability: It might be difficult to determine if electronic evidence is real and admissible since data on the internet can differ between devices and sources. Courts may have trouble comprehending the technical intricacy of digital evidence, which compromises its credibility and applicability.
10. Dynamic Data Updates: The legitimacy and admissibility of electronic evidence may be contested by data that is changed regularly, such as transactional databases and webpages.
11. Destruction of Data Information held on electronic devices can be quickly destroyed by viruses and mechanical damage, which emphasizes the need for proper maintenance.

Role of Digital forensic expert in Digital Evidence

The science of locating, gathering, safeguarding, recording, inspecting, and evaluating evidence from computer systems so that it can be used as proof in court is known as digital forensics. It is thorough and reproducible, requiring the use of a computer for both data analysis and data retrieval from digital devices.

An expert witness in digital forensics uses a variety of instruments to retrieve and analyse data, ranging from manually examining a file's binary code to utilising software that streamlines numerous inspection procedures.

They take into account the volume and distinctive nature of the digital evidence. When analysing binary data, it's important to make sure that investigators and lawyers can understand it because inexperienced people could interpret the data incorrectly.

The expert witness for digital forensics provides a chronological account of event along with their findings and includes findings in the expert witness report.

A digital forensic specialist is an essential intermediary between the legal system and technology; they are experts in gathering, digital evidence preservation, analysis, and presentation in a range of legal and investigative settings. The gathering of technological equipment and pertinent case papers is the first step in their work. This first step is essential to make sure that all possible digital evidence sources-from servers and digital storage media to laptops and smartphones-are protected. In order to preserve a clear chain of custody, properly gathering evidence requires not only identifying these gadgets but also recording their location and physical status.

Another crucial duty of a digital forensic specialist is the preservation of digital evidence. To stop tampering, they must protect the integrity of the evidence. modification or annihilation. To ensure that the original data is preserved during the investigation, this entails creating forensic photographs of storage devices using certain procedures and tools. The expert guarantees that the digital evidence will withstand examination in a court of law by doing this.

The analysis of digital data is the core responsibility of a digital forensic specialist. They carefully go over the information on the seized devices in search of proof of illicit behaviour, cybercrimes, or security lapses. Examining documents, emails, databases, system logs, and any other digital artefacts that potentially contain pertinent data are all part of this process. Compiling a complete picture of the events can also necessitate recovering erased or damaged information or decrypting encrypted data.

An essential component of the digital forensic procedure is documentation. The expert is required to compile thorough reports and documentation of their methods, instruments, and conclusions from the inquiry. These reports ensure accountability and openness by providing a thorough record of the inquiry process. In the event that the matter is taken to court, they also serve as a foundation for expert testimony.

The digital forensic specialist is frequently asked to testify as an expert witness in court. They are responsible for elucidating the technical components of the evidence and difficult topics pertaining to digital forensics, including the evidence's reliability, the analysis's methodologies, and the implications of their conclusions. Expert testimony has a significant impact on how a case turns out.

Sit facilitates comprehension of the ramifications of digital evidence for juries and judges.

In digital forensics, establishing a secure chain of custody is crucial. It entails maintaining a close log of everyone who has access to the evidence at all times over the course of the inquiry. To ensure the admissibility of digital evidence in court, this chain of custody paperwork is necessary. It proves that the evidence has been treated with care to maintain its validity and integrity.

Steps involved in digital forensic. [14]

1. Identification
2. Preservation
3. Analysis
4. Documentation
5. Presentation

Experts in digital forensics not only gather and examine evidence, but they also act as translators, filling in the gaps between jurors' and judges' comprehension of the technical nuances of digital data. Since evidence has no voice of its own, it is up to these professionals to properly present and interpret it. It is anticipated that these specialists will supply data to aid the court in drawing conclusions, and their own judgments might be taken into account.

Still, the court must decide for itself whether the defendant is guilty, or innocent based on the evidence that is given. As experts, forensic professionals ought to offer scientific opinions to support the court in formulating these ruling decisions.

Finding the necessary acquisition processes is the first step in a forensic analysis., determining the required data, and choosing the suitable analytic techniques. However, when handling complicated, large-scale situations or new case categories, the current methods may not always allow this planning. In these kinds of situations, practitioners need access to pertinent case background data in order to assist them in managing large amounts of case data that could otherwise be too much for them to handle.

Defining the scope and objectives of a criminal investigation can be difficult when dealing with large datasets and lack proper tools, standards, or organized support procedures. Sadly, many of the forensic tools available today are first-generation, not providing the practitioner with the decision assistance they require for investigation.

Digital forensics, which includes computer and cyber forensics, combines the expertise of a cyber analyst, a detective with experience in criminal investigation, and a offences, as well as a legal professional versed in the legislation and judicial processes. Navigating the intricacies of digital evidence calls for a diverse skill set.

Concern over self-described cyber forensic specialists and the industry's propensity for mediocrity is growing. Some people who lack the required credentials might deceive the legal system, and their testimony would frequently go uncontested. However, the courts, government agencies, businesses, and computer and information security groups all have basic expectations about professionalism and experience. These guidelines aid in ensuring that digital forensic investigations and the evidence they create are accurate and credible.

International Comparison
According to statistics about 493 million cyberattack were detected by companies. According to FBI India is among top 5 of being victimised by cybercrime. USA at top followed by UK, Canada then India. Based on historical data, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and India have been known to be targeted by cybercriminals, with the United States typically being at the top due to its large economy and extensive digital infrastructure. The United Kingdom and Canada have also been prime targets, often due to their significant financial sectors and technological advancements.

India, with its rapidly growing digital population and increasing internet penetration, has seen a rise in cyberattacks. Factors contributing to India's vulnerability include a large online user base and varying levels of cybersecurity awareness and preparedness across different sectors.

In India, the legal framework for cybercrime investigation is underpinned by several crucial laws and regulations. The Information Technology Act, 2000 serves as the cornerstone, governing electronic transactions and digital signatures. It's complemented by provisions in the Code of Criminal Procedure, including Section 91 (summons), Section 93 (search warrants), and Section 165 (search and seizure), which empower law enforcement in evidence collection.

Furthermore, the Indian Evidence Act provides the necessary legal basis for presenting digital evidence in court. Notably, the Cyber Investigation Manual offers comprehensive guidelines for conducting investigations in the digital realm.

In the United States, cybercrime investigations are guided by laws like the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA) and various federal and state-level regulations, including the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). Meanwhile, the United Kingdom relies on the Computer Misuse Act 1990 as its primary legal framework for tackling cybercrimes. These laws and regulations are indispensable tools, enabling law enforcement agencies to effectively investigate, prosecute, and deter cybercriminals.

In India there is initiative taken by ministry of home affairs, govt of India to tackle the cybercrime that is happening in the country. the name of initiative is (14C). The main objective of 14C is to improve coordination between various law enforcement agencies and stakeholder to tackle cybercrime. The above initiative has 7 components to tackle the cyber attack.

• National cybercrime Threat Analytical Unit (TAU)
• National cybercrime Forensics Laboratory (NCFL)
• National cybercrime Training Centre (NCTC)
• Cybercrime Management
• Platform for Joint Cybercrime Investigation Team
• National Cybercrime Reporting Portal
• National Cybercrime Reporting Portal

After filing in the portal, the investigation process will start National cybercrime forensics laboratory (NCFL) play a crucial role in finding the evidence and help in the investigation. The National Cyber Forensics Laboratory (NCFL) is a comprehensive institution equipped with various specialized units, including Memory Forensics Labs, Image Enhancement Lab, Network Forensics Lab, Malware Forensics Lab, Cryptocurrency Forensics Lab, Damaged Hard Disk Labs, and Advanced Mobile Forensics Labs.

These units collectively offer a wide range of essential digital forensic services such as Memory Forensics, Mobile Forensics, Network Log Analysis, Malware Forensics, Damaged Disk information extraction, Audio, Image & Video enhancement, and Cryptocurrency Forensics. The online NCFL portal further streamlines the process with features like User Registration, Forensic Request Submission, Appointment Scheduling, Online Document Submission, Submission of Small Evidence, and Online Help.

NCFL not only aids Central and State Law Enforcement Agencies in proactively addressing digital forensics challenges but also offers numerous benefits, including digital evidence recovery, support for small evidence, video enhancement and restoration using non-destructive techniques, a team of expert forensic analysts, an advanced centre for data extraction from damaged devices, and access to the latest forensic tools. NCFL plays a crucial role in the world of digital forensics, supporting investigators in their pursuit of justice.

In USA the FBI has a comprehensive approach to combat cybercrime, with specially trained cyber squads in all 56 field offices collaborating with interagency task force partners. They have a rapid-response Cyber Action Team capable of quickly deploying nationwide to address major incidents. The FBI's global presence includes cyber assistant legal attach�s in embassies to cooperate with international counterparts on cybercrime investigations.

The Internet Crime Complaint Centre (IC3) collects reports from the public and has a Recovery Asset Team that has helped freeze substantial funds for cybercrime victims. Additionally, the FBI's 24/7 operations centre, Catch, provides continuous support for incident tracking and communication with field offices across the country.

Suggestion
To address this critical issue, we firmly believe that a well-structured and comprehensive curriculum for cybersecurity courses is essential. This curriculum should cover a wide range of topics, from fundamental principles to advanced techniques, ensuring that students are equipped with the knowledge and skills needed to protect our digital infrastructure effectively.

Furthermore, a parallel concern exists regarding the shortage of skilled cybercrime investigators. Proper training and an up-to-date curriculum are imperative for investigators to meet the demands of modern cybercrime. This curriculum should encompass digital forensic techniques from basic to advanced levels, providing investigators with practical knowledge of the cyber landscape.

One effective strategy to bridge these skill gaps is the implementation of short courses, such as certifications in digital forensics or cybersecurity. These courses offer a focused and efficient means for individuals to acquire specific skills quickly, helping to meet the demands of the rapidly evolving cybersecurity and digital forensic domains.

To enhance the capabilities of cyber departments, a multifaceted approach is imperative. First, the introduction of tech-savvy youngsters into the cyber workforce is crucial. These digital natives, with their innate understanding of emerging technologies, can inject fresh perspectives and innovative ideas into the department. Their familiarity with the digital landscape can be harnessed to tackle complex cyber threats effectively.

Conclusion
Looking ahead, it's certain that computers will continue to play a crucial role in our daily lives, acting as necessary tools for a wide range of tasks. On the other hand, an increase in cybercrimes is expected to be fueled by our growing reliance on technology. To effectively counter these dangers, a methodical and thorough approach to finding the truth must be taken.

It becomes absolutely necessary to provide law enforcement and judicial professionals with comprehensive training. At this critical juncture, significant progress in strengthening India's ability to prosecute cybercrime cases is imperative.

This entails not only identifying the increasing dangers posed by digital technology but also preemptively providing experts with the abilities and information needed to manoeuvre through and counteract the changing terrain of cybercrime activity. It's an appeal for all-encompassing actions and developments to protect our digital Lives.

End-Notes:

1. Forensics And Digital Evidence In Cybercrime Investigation - https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Chibuike-Uzoagba/publication/368692167_FORENSICS_AND_DIGITAL_EVIDENCE_IN_CYBERCRIME_INVESTIGATION/links/63f6055fb1704f343f74a659/FORENSICS-AND_DIGITAL-EVIDENCE-IN-CYBERCRIME-INVESTIGATION.pdf?origin=publication_detail
2. Role And Impact Of Digital Forensics In Cyber Crime Investigations - https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David-Mugisha/publication/331991596_ROLE_AND_IMPACT_OF_DIGITAL_FORENSICS_IN_CYBER_CRIME_INVESTIGATIONS/links/5c9a2f38299bf11169486413/ROLE-AND-IMPACT-OF-DIGITAL-FORENSICS-IN-CYBER-CRIME-INVESTIGATIONS.pdf
3. Indian Evidence Act,1872
4. Indian Evidence Act,1872
5. Indian Evidence Act,1872
6. Indian Evidence Act ,1872
7. Information technology act ,2000
8. Information technology act ,2000
9. Information technology act, 2000
10. (2003 )4 SCC 601 S
11. AIR 2015 SC 1
12. (2005)11 SC 600
13. Blue Ocean Global Tech - https://www.blueoceanglobaltech.com

Also Read:

• Admissibility of Digital Evidence
• 
  

  Award Winning Article Is Written By: Mr.Soumya Prakash Hota
  

  Authentication No: JN436810175799-2-0124