The whole study is on the trail procedure as per criminal procedure code. It gives the whole idea of trail proceedings in the session court. It describes all the steps which are part of proceedings. We must first grasp the very fundamental idea of a trial before moving on to the different concepts connected with trials in India's criminal justice system. The Court's ruling or a judicial judgement by the Court determining the person's guilt or innocence is what is generally meant by the term "trial."

In a criminal case, a trial is extremely important. When the pre-trial process, including the First Information Report and investigation, is over, the trial stage begins. The criminal procedural code of 1973, the Indian penal code of 1860, and the Indian Evidence Act of 1872, in that order, regulate the process, the punishment, and the facts or evidence in each case. The CrPC, 1973 specifies the process for criminal trials and the different types of trials.

Introduction
When discussing the nation's legal changes, we cannot overlook the enormous diversity that exists in India, a country where the most significant and obvious feature that is easy to detect is the nation's diversity. The Nirbhaya case, the Taj attacks of 26/11, and a long list of other significant court cases have been witnessed by the Indian country. In a very short period of time, India's legal system underwent a very significant transformation, and as that transition continues to proceed at an increasingly rapid rate, the Indian subcontinent's legal landscape will continue to evolve significantly.

The first instance involved Ascentia Dawes, a British woman who was accused of killing her slave daughter, and it occurred in 1665. Thus, the trip began with the case of a British woman, and the well-known case of KM Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra[iii] brought an end to jury trials. (Though the Nanavati case was not the last case to end the practice of jury trials but was the most famous case which led to the closure of the process of jury trial).

The jury trial system was divided into two halves with the expansion of the East India Company into the Indian subcontinent. The first was inside the presidential towns of Bombay, Calcutta, and Madras.

The prerequisites listed in Section 190 CrPC must be satisfied before the Magistrate can begin proceedings; this statement essentially refers to the Magistrate's authority to acquire knowledge of a case. In essence, Section 204 of the CrPC gives the Magistrate the sole authority to either take the matter into consideration or to reject the case for a specific reason. This section also establishes whether a matter can go to the trial stage or not.

The primary goal of the criminal trial process is to establish the truth, which must be fair to all parties involved, including the accused, the victim, and society.

According to Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, the right to obtain a reasonable preliminary is a crucial right.

The term "preliminary" basically refers to the evaluation of the facts at issue in a case while being observed by a judge, which frequently entails both legal and factual concerns

Trail procedure by court of session
According to sections 225 to 236 of the CrPC, the trial process in the Court of Session must be conducted.

According to Section 225, a Public Prosecutor will oversee the arraignment in each trial before the Court of Session. Any person chosen in accordance with Section 24 of the Criminal Procedure Code is impliedly a Public Prosecutor, as is any person working as a community worker.

Opening case for prosecution (section 226)
It states that the investigator will present his case by describing the charge brought against the accused and expressing by what evidence he proposes to demonstrate the blame of the charged when the accused appears or is brought under the Court's scrutiny in compliance with a dedication of the case under section 209.

Here, the public investigator will provide a concise summary of the evidence and the key details of the observers, it is not necessary for an indictment to include comprehensive details of the evidence.

Discharge (section 227)
According to Section 227, if the judge determines that there is insufficient evidence to continue the case against the accused and after hearing the entries of the accused and the indictment for this purpose, releases the accused and documents his justifications for doing so.

Here, the judge must apply his legal acumen to the current circumstances of the case to determine whether the indictment establishes a basis for a preliminary hearing.

Framing of charges (section 228)
According to Section 228 of the law, the judge may lay out a charge against the accused if, following the same consideration and hearing as provided in prior cases, the judge feels that there is cause to believe that the accused committed an offence.

The accuser will read the charge and inform them of it, and the accused will be asked about it.

Whether he admits to the alleged crime or says it was attempted.

Conviction on plea of guilty (section 229)
If the accused admits to committing the crime and agrees to the charges at this point in the preliminary process, he may be indicted for those offences under section 229 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

If the accused claims they are not at fault, the appointed authority will then order that the Trial proceed, and that the accused appear in court.

The request of the guilty must be made in clear terms; otherwise, it is impossible to see how such a request could ever be justified.

Date for prosecution evidence (section 230)
The judge will set a date for the evaluation of witnesses in the unlikely event that the defendant declines to enter a plea, refuses to have the case tried, or is not indicted in accordance with Section 229, and may, at the request of the prosecution, issue any process for persuading any witness to testify or to produce any report or other evidence.

Evidence for prosecution (section 231)
The judge will continue to accept all evidence that may be presented in support of the indictment on the predetermined date.

According to Section 3 of the Evidence Act, evidence includes any explanations that witnesses must give in front of the court in relation to the truth claims being made.

Every archive, including digital records, was made for the Court's evaluation. Witnesses will initially undergo an in-boss examination, followed by a cross examination at the request of the opposing side, and a final examination at the request of the group calling the witness.

Record of evidence
According to Section 276 of the Criminal Procedure Code, each witness' testimony in all trials conducted under the supervision of a Court of Session shall be taken down and recorded as a hard copy either by the presiding Judge himself, by his correspondence in open Court, or under his course and supervision, by a court official delegated by him.

Such evidence is often presented as an account, although the directing Judge may, in his

Caution, discrediting, and evidence like a question-and-answer exchange. The managing Judge will annotate the evidence that has been presented and include it into the record.

Assessment of accused
Sec. 313 allows for the court's evaluation of the accused in order to give the person being charged a time to address the allegations made against him in the evidence.

Here, the consideration of the accused must be open to any exonerating information or conditions that are documented to provide him with a chance to provide an explanation should he choose to do so.

Acquittal (section 232)
If the judge determines that there is no evidence that the accused committed the crime after reviewing the prosecution's evidence, questioning the accused, and hearing from both the prosecution and the defence on the matter, the judge must enter an order of acquittal.

Evidence for defence (section 233)
If the accused is not found guilty under section 232, he will be required to present his case and any extra evidence he may have to back it up. The purpose of this required clause is to protect the accused person's rights. The accused is required to enter into his defence and the court is obligated to name him.

Present evidence; he may also have evidence in support of it.

Argument (section 234)
The prosecutor will summarize his case when the defence's witnesses have finished testifying, and the accused or his pleader will have the opportunity to respond.

If the accused or his pleader raises a legal issue, the prosecution may, with the judge's approval, present its case in relation to that legal issue.

Judgment for acquittal or conviction (section 235)
The judge will provide a ruling in the case after hearing all of the arguments and legal arguments.

Section 235 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code provides for a distinct and unique stage of the trial to be conducted once the accused is found guilty and a court order of conviction is recorded. In this case, the accused must testify before the court on the sentencing. Pre-sentence hearings are allowed under the provision.

The purpose of this clause Is to provide the court with social and private information about the offender so that it can determine the proper sentence in light of the conviction.

Fair Trail:
When discussing the nation's system for delivering justice, one concern, or perhaps I should say a mocking, is raised regarding the lengthy and onerous process that frequently results in unfairness to the victims. The Nirbhaya case is the most well-known instance of delayed justice that comes to mind. The crime occurred in 2012, and the defendants were hanged to death in 2020.

Thus, the question of what constitutes a fair trial is raised. Has it anything to do with how long it takes for a case to be resolved or whether the accused is given his rights while being held in custody, among other unanswered questions.

According to Article 22 of the Indian Constitution, citizens of that country have a basic right to free legal representation. (1). It is covered in Section 304 of the CrPC in addition to the Constitution. Legal assistance to accused at State expense in certain instances is described in Section 304.

Simply put, Section 304 offers assistance to the accused, The court must appoint a pleader to represent the accused whenever he or she is unable to do so on their own, and the State will pay all associated costs, according to sub-section (1) of this section. The procedure for designating the pleader to the accused, the method of designating, and other details is largely covered in Subsection (2) of the Section is essentially the method of choosing the pleader to represent the accused, the facilities, etc.

In a case that was decided, Kishore Singh Ravinder Dev v. State of Rajasthan, it was determined that the laws and rules outlined in India's legal system had elaborate safeguards in place to protect the rights of the accused in order to preserve his (the accused's) dignity as a human being and give him the benefit of a free, fair, and impartial trial.

There is always a conflict of interest between the society and the accused, but the judge should always consider his own reasoning when deciding in such cases. Every person has a right to a fair trial, which is a concept that is very broad and subjective and cannot be limited to the various laws and rulings mentioned in the legal system. The Courts have also expanded the dimensions associated with the concept of fair trial.

Conclusion
So, to sum up, this essay has covered a variety of important factors relating to the notion of "trial" that are crucial for everyone working in the legal field to understand. The numerous offences and penalties under the Indian criminal code have undergone a significant transformation, and as time goes on, more and more concepts will undoubtedly be investigated and added to the code.